What the ethical objections to euthanasia?

Question

I would like to know exactly what reasons guide the medical and legal professions in banning euthanasia.

Answer 1

The only 'ethical' as opposed to religious objection I have heard is that legalized euthanasia 'opens the door' to 'legalized murder' of people who have outlived their usefulness and become a burden to their family.
But of course, murder would still be illegal, wouldn't it- and I'm sure that there would be strict guidelines to prevent such abuses.
As it is, a person with no quality of life, experiencing nothing but pain, is forced to continue in their misery , often in spite of their express wishes. So what about the ethics of that.
The main objections/ objectors seem to be on religious grounds. ie it's suicide, so that would be a sin!
My view is, if you and your God want to cause unnecesary suffering to the helpless- you and your God can bugger off!

As somebody once said "Whose life is it, anyway?"

Answer 2

In England, suicide used to be a capital crime; as a citizen you owe your life to the state, you have no right to kill yourself because you would be depriving the state of your effort and future tax revenues etc... If you attempted to kill yourself and failed, you were hanged! I kid you not!

Today, from a government point of view, and this is totally nasty, there is still a financial incentive; the revenue generated by a sick person is much greater than a dead one... Doctors pay a lot more tax than undertakers...

I'm pro-choice by the way; no man may judge the limit of another man's suffering. The right to life and the pursuit of happiness implies the right to die whenever and however you like... As long as it does not violate the rights of others that is.

Answer 3

first, it is hard to ensure that the patient really intended to die or is just speaking in pain...we sometimes say things in anger or pain that we later don't mean.

second, undue influence has a part...there could be doctors and other medical professionals with an agenda that will encourage someone to die and they really didn't want to...this is a painful and confusing time we don't want others having the power to convince a patient to die....the next inevitable step will be doctors telling patients they have no chance when a chance does exist and the doctor doesn't want to do it or it is expensive

third, with out medical advances there are illenses we can cure and treat that we couldn't before...would you really want your mom having them pull the cord and a week later a drug comes out that would have extended her life considerably? It happens more often than you think.

Answer 4

hi, a nicely theory out question! mutually as I do believe you...you're able to be able to desire to bear in mind that for themes like stem cells and cloning, each and every of the moral objections are in basic terms religiously-based and with out the non secular values, would not be considered immoral in any respect. Take a 2d to think of approximately stem cells and not using a SHRED of any faith or non secular values influencing your decision. Yeah, stem cellular analyze seems particularly super would not it--miraculously heal residing, respiration those with only a speck of cells? dazzling! it form of feels immoral to bog down it! those with families and friends get to stick around, with out real sacrifice. yet no, faith says the cells are little ones and this is immoral to apply them. mutually because it truly is an oversimplification of the subject, i think of you spot the place you're getting at. faith urges you to think of with your coronary heart just about each and every of the time, whilst there are various themes the place your head must be the only undertaking in touch. thinking approximately your loved ones? Use your coronary heart. thinking approximately your lover? Use your coronary heart. thinking approximately regulations and public coverage? Use your ****ing head!

Answer 5

If the guest of honor at a euthanasia session is unable to make the decision, it equates to murder.
If that person _can_ make the decision, it equates to suicide.

Answer 6

this made me think. what are the ethical differences between alowing someone to die with 'do not resusitate' or whatever and giving them assistance

Answer 7

only some countries allow this, i think it should be allowed when you are near the end,shame to die in pain, all the best