English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's amnesty no matter what they call it, and paves the way for the NAFTA superhighway and the NAU.

2007-05-23 19:04:38 · 6 answers · asked by Eyes 5 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

He wants to destroy the United Sates of America as we know it! He has this ridiculous and utterly destructive belief that we would be better off if the US, Canada and Mexico were all one big country. All I can say is everyone out there better fight like hell to preserve our sovereignty or we are all doomed!!! Me; I'll go to the UK or France, if it ever happens.

2007-05-23 19:21:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i do not think the NAU will be of much benefit to either Canada or Mexico . the thing which has me wondering is this just a distraction from other issues which people should be united on. also i wonder why the U.S. goes on about all the people who come to the U.S, to escape Cuba only to wind up being discrimminated against and yet as this continues the message that people came to the U.S. FOR A BETTER LIFE is told time and time again everyone comes here to better themselves it is said. also not everyone is in the U.S. illegally at least under the laws of the U.S. but as the focus seems to be on Mexicans or those that are equated with MEXICANS not all are in the country illegally they could be descendants of those who moved to the U.S. FROM places in south america or were there when California became part of the U.S. as to amnesty what is this illegal buisness anyway maybe pass tough laws to protect the environment in mexico and your problem is solved same with U.S. if there ever is an NAU this will have to be done or it will not work. it is Green Answer not an AMNESTY that will solve the problem. besides Bush was in favour of stronger laws at first to keep people out also there wasa senator that proposed a fence be built to keep people out

2007-05-24 03:37:56 · answer #2 · answered by darren m 7 · 0 0

You have a great point but i have to still wonder ... if a democrat were the president and it was an upcoming election ...dont you think they would even sponsor a more liberal bill than this one ? They both suck but I could see someone like Al Gore or Kerry really paving the way . But you are right ..it sucks .

2007-05-24 02:25:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He made promises to his buddies at the Presidential palace in Mexico City (plus it was a campaign promise and a priority that became sidetracked by the war on radical Islam). Time is running out, you know.

2007-05-24 03:51:15 · answer #4 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0 1

Bush lives in Never Never Land.

2007-05-24 02:35:22 · answer #5 · answered by Nevermore 3 · 0 2

If Bush wants it passed it most likely will be profitable to some republican somewhere and ipso facto payoff to Bush's nuts. If by chance its good for America too then thats just coincidence.

2007-05-24 02:08:27 · answer #6 · answered by casey v 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers