do you really think there were cave man in the beginning?

Question

Is there any proof of cave people? I mean wild hair, sharp teeth, fur rags on them.

Answer 1

If you believe in the bible at all, you might find this interesting...

In Job 30: 5-6, it speaks of cavemen. Note that these were not ape-men, but descendants of those who scattered from Babel. They were driven from the community by those tribes who competed successfully for the more desirable regions of the earth. They deteriorated mentally, physically, and spiritually from being alone in these caves and such. (Go into a bad part of your town and you will see this concept in action today. Ever seen a unstable, jittery, Neanderthal-like homeless guy?) This is actual historical fact that can be thoroughly researched outside of the Bible, in secular history text, such as The Antiquities of the Jews and The Annals (both of which, speak of Jesus in the historical sense, citing his different works in different places and witnesses.)

I researched this for a previous question I had answered, and i found it really interesting...


btw Joel m,
carbon dating can only be use to date geologically young, 35k - 50k years, carbon containing substances. So it cant be used to prove an age over 50, 000, and also, any tool will give bad results when misused, which is a common occurrence in carbon dating methods. Radiocarbon dating has some known limitations. Any measurement that exceeds these limitations will be invalid, meaning, using it to date older items will give bad results. Samples can be contaminated with younger or older carbon (another occurrence that happens often), again invalidating the results. Because of excess 12C released into the atmosphere from the Industrial Revolution and excess 14C produced by atmospheric nuclear testing during the 1950s, materials less than 150 years old cannot be dated with radiocarbon with intent to receive accurate results.

I don't just read and follow the bible mindlessly, i actually researched the topic of cavemen in secular texts first, (which you would have seen if you has actually read the whole thing before making any assumptions) which led me to the biblical references, which i thought she would appreciate, since i noticed that she's answered a few questions with bible verses. So how about instead of being biased from the get-go, and actually look into something before you give an answer? Might be better than attacking someone else's idea before you understand what they meant by it.

oh and here's more facts to mull around...

We often hear that science has proved evolution. This is not so. When it is PROVEN it will no longer no be called the THEORY of evolution. You see, people often confuse scientific fact with scientific theory. Current scientific theory does conflict with creation. But the facts of science do not! There are many scientists who fully accept Biblical creation.

The theory of evolution says that over millions of years simple life forms (one celled creatures) slowly evolved into complex life forms (fish), and that one kind of animal evolved into another kind (ape to man). But if the Bible is wrong and man actually did evolve in small graduations over a long period of time, we should find ample fossil evidence of links in intermediate stages of transition. For decades, evolutionists have searched for fossils of these links to prove biblical creation wrong. Although millions of fossils have been unearthed, not even one missing link has ever been found. Has it ever occurred to you that this is the reason why scientists refer to them as MISSING links?

Even Charles Darwin realized the difficulty missing links gave his theory. Darwin wrote in his book, Origin Of The Species, "Why, if species have descended from other species by fine graduation, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" The reason we have never found any missing links is quite simple. They aren't there to be found.
If you want further info, i can actually give you scientific evidence for proving the bible. Just look into my past answers if you're interested.

Answer 2

lots of human beings lived in caves and mountains fastnesses in the process the Ice Age. as quickly as the ice receded they set forward to new places. They probable had momentary dwellings comparable to a yurtz or teepee which they could do away with as they proceded on their adventure. There are particularly circumstances older dwellings discovered,however the 1st time human beings began residing in residences enmasse became in the process the neolithic revolution-the dawn of agriculture. on the brink of me a village of 5000 365 days previous residences has been discovered-they have been nicely geared up andrectangular with wood shelving.

Answer 3

Theres tons of proof of cavemen, from Cro-Magnon (the European Caveman) to Homo-erectus. Scientists have found small tools and have examined the brain size of early "cavemen" dating back millions of years.

Answer 4

There's no evidence of "sharp teeth," but remains do show that they wore fur; and I doubt that they combed their hair neatly.

Lots of info here:
http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/N/neanderthal/

Answer 5

Of course there is proof. Archeological findings ring a bell?

Answer 6

You forgot Rachel Welch in a skimpy outfit

Answer 7

Yes. They even found a complete frozen one in the Alps.

Answer 8

yea, it's called scientific evidence, like the fact that we use technology to study mars, we use carbon dating to study fossils,

Unlike bible readers who just read and follow mindlessly, and don't question the silly story... like the whole 7 days of creation thing... sounds like a comedic joke to me...and that whole adam and eve thing... yea , you,yes you, DID evolve from a monkey believe it or NOT>

Answer 9

Beside those paintings on the wall there is plenty of other proof that they existed...................................