English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

No lover thanks, not looking to be anyone's possession at this point in life.

2007-05-23 17:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by patti duke 7 · 0 0

Possesive lover, all the way. Better some than none at all right?!

2007-05-24 00:31:50 · answer #2 · answered by hungryeyes001 4 · 1 0

Possesive lover for sure , then I would not have to play with myself , ha ha !

2007-05-24 01:23:22 · answer #3 · answered by mundane complexity 3 · 1 0

Possessive lover. It sucks having no lover at all.

2007-05-24 00:32:54 · answer #4 · answered by Meeya 7 · 0 0

No lover

2007-05-24 00:32:44 · answer #5 · answered by Iris 4 · 1 0

Possesive m but not all the time , I'd try to get a compromise .

2007-05-24 00:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Possessive is much better then no lover, unless the former is brutal.

2007-05-24 00:32:13 · answer #7 · answered by debdini 5 · 1 0

No lover at all!

2007-05-24 00:33:09 · answer #8 · answered by shyne 4 · 0 0

No Lover,.....im not an item, but a person of equal value.

2007-05-24 00:44:38 · answer #9 · answered by Seeking 6 · 0 1

Possesive for sure.

2007-05-24 00:31:22 · answer #10 · answered by Cutemum 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers