No lover thanks, not looking to be anyone's possession at this point in life.
2007-05-23 17:34:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by patti duke 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possesive lover, all the way. Better some than none at all right?!
2007-05-24 00:31:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by hungryeyes001 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Possesive lover for sure , then I would not have to play with myself , ha ha !
2007-05-24 01:23:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by mundane complexity 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Possessive lover. It sucks having no lover at all.
2007-05-24 00:32:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Meeya 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No lover
2007-05-24 00:32:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Iris 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Possesive m but not all the time , I'd try to get a compromise .
2007-05-24 00:39:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possessive is much better then no lover, unless the former is brutal.
2007-05-24 00:32:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by debdini 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No lover at all!
2007-05-24 00:33:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by shyne 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Lover,.....im not an item, but a person of equal value.
2007-05-24 00:44:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Seeking 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Possesive for sure.
2007-05-24 00:31:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cutemum 6
·
0⤊
0⤋