English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lets say some one could go back in history in order to kill you. At what stage of pregnancy would it have been ok for him to convice your mother to do so with out you feeling like it was murder on your part?

2007-05-23 17:24:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

16 answers

Abortion is murder at ANY stage of the pregnancy to me. Others might think otherwise. Someone DID try t convince my mom, but thankfully she did not budge..

Thanks mom!!

2007-05-23 17:29:27 · answer #1 · answered by Jan 6 · 0 4

Well, being that abortions weren't widely available at the time, I would say she could have chosen any point in the pregnancy to swallow drano, or hook up a vacuum, or find a doctor with a coat hanger, which are just some of the horrible things that women resort to when a safe and legal abortion is not an option.
You are misguided if you believe that making abortion illegal will stop them from taking place.
I would have to go with: anytime that would have been the safest for my mother, if that was the choice she felt she had to make.

2007-05-24 00:34:54 · answer #2 · answered by samantha 7 · 1 1

If God said that abortion was killing then it would be killing. But it is only you that is saying it is killing. And the Bible says that it is not killing. So God says it is not and you say it is. I think I will believe God.
And it is clear why God allows abortion. Each time a child is aborted, it frees up resouces to save 12 loved and living children. (see http://www.prolifeismurder.com) So if I abort, I save 12 and do not kill. But if I do as you say, I am responsible for the death of 12 children.
That is what God does, he punishes pro lifers by making them responsible for the death of children.

2007-05-26 07:05:47 · answer #3 · answered by Give me Liberty 5 · 0 1

If my mother was 13 and was in danger of dieing or ruining her life. Luckily that wasnt the case, but it's better to end the life of an unwanted fetus than to ruin and possibly take the life of the mother.

2007-05-24 01:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your question is implying that abortion=murder. Do you have any facts that prove an embryo is a human life that can sustain life outside of the mother's uterus?

2007-05-24 00:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

um, if my mom got convinced to abort me, i wouldn't have known nor cared. feoti are not sentient until the mid-second trimester. anytime before sentience would have been most appropriate IF my mom was convinced to abort me.

2007-05-25 19:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by GothicLady 6 · 0 1

I would have liked to have it done at a stage when it would be least harmful to my mother

2007-05-24 00:27:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I'm going with partial birth to block.

2007-05-24 00:27:47 · answer #8 · answered by Josh Bastard 3 · 0 0

let's see....I doubt that, if I had been aborted, I would have cared one way or another...as good looking as you are, your question has serious holes in it.

2007-05-24 00:27:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

it is always a murder when u go for abortion.............. u r killing a soul; which has been destined for the world

2007-05-24 01:12:29 · answer #10 · answered by all a 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers