2007-05-23 16:41:35 · 17 answers · asked by Y2J 5 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
The Hardy boyz.
2007-05-23 16:45:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it depends...Kane and Taker would be a really strong tag team. The Hardy Boyz it more agility...but I think that The Hardy Boyz are better because I dont think there are really good tag teams for Undertaker and Kane and the Hardy Boyz have more competition
2007-05-23 16:46:58 · answer #2 · answered by Andres 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thing about the teams, is that they are kinda like one another. Jeff Hardy is a lot like Undertaker, while Matt Hardy is alot like Kane. Let me explain...
Undertaker is more successful than Kane
Jeff is more successful than Matt
Undertaker is more popular than Kane
Jeff is more popular than Matt
Kane is more consistent than Undertaker
Matt is more consistent than Jeff
Kane is a little bit bigger than Undertaker
Matt is a little bit bigger than Jeff
Jeff and Undertaker have feuded in the past...
Matt and Kane have feud in the past (over lita)
Kane and Undertaker have feuded in the past
Jeff and Matt have feuded in the past
Undertaker and Kane are brothers
Jeff and Matt are brothers
Besides for the fact that Taker and Kane are large, and The Hardy's are faster, they are very much a like. So, I'm going to say neither team is more successful. Because even though Matt and Jeff have had more reigns as tag champs, Taker and Kane were always more dominate Tag Champs...
So...Brothers of Destruction = The Hardy's
2007-05-23 17:17:21 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kane and Taker without a shadow of a doubt. They could take those little Hardy Boyz and send them over to play at the kiddie park - permanently!
2007-05-23 17:21:47 · answer #4 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The hardys, because they have a lot of flexibilty moves going around but KANE & TAKER are good but they considered to be Brothers of Destruction, and many people like the hardys more because they have good appearances and cool moves such as: Swantom bomb, and twist of fate, they're exciting to look at, though. But still, i dont say that the brothers of destruction are a bad team, but in my opinion i think that the Hardys are better.
2007-05-23 16:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by @Be CGSFL ELMAS CENAFAN AK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The brothers of destruction without doubt.The Hardys are one of my favorite tag teams they really know how to "fly" on the ring,but
I prefer Taker and Kane because of their power and because they are tooooooooo strong.
2007-05-23 16:49:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kane & Taker they have a lot of stamina. But in a TLC match the Hardys can win!!
2007-05-23 16:45:16 · answer #7 · answered by Steve-O 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both at the top of their weight class lets put it that way. Heavyweights Taker and Kane middleweight's the Hardy's.
Overall I would go with the BOD cause being fast and jumping around like that just means you will burn up a lot quicker and you are more predictable.
2007-05-23 18:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by dyna_hd1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. Sheik Abdul Bashir, Kyoshi, Brutus Magnus,Doug Williams,Rob Terry & Eric youthful(international Elite)-doug willams 2. Jeff Hardy & Matt Hardy( The Hardy Boys)-jeff hardy 3. Jay deadly & effects Creed( deadly effects)-effects creed 4. Christian & Chris Jericho-christian 5. John Morrison & The Miz-miz(kinda equivalent miz had nc skills john morrison had expertise) 6. Rey Mysterio & Eddie Guerrero-rey rey 7. The Undertaker & vast show-vast show 8. Shawn Michaels & Mart Jannetty(The Rockers)-mart jannetty 9. part, Chavo Guerrero, Curt Hawkins & Zack Ryder(Rated R Entourage)chavo 10. Undertaker & Kane( The Brothers Of Destruction)-kane
2016-11-05 04:53:11 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kane and Taker
2007-05-23 16:51:10 · answer #10 · answered by everybody loves 3000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋