2007-05-23 15:49:49 · 7 answers · asked by 6th Finger 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Much better than Bush...but Rudy is not my top pick.
People might vote for Rudy in that he is quite a leader (people do believe that despite what you might believe to the contrary). They might also think it much better to have Rudy in the White House than Hillary or Obama (and that he would have the best chance to win).
I don't agree with Rudy on the issues...I will be voting and supporting someone else (at least up until we have a Republican nominee).
McCain is the real no good of the lot. He will NEVER get my vote, and I know quite a few that agree with me.
2007-05-23 15:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by Calvin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Guiliani has proven his leadership. Dealing with the problems of New York not counting 9-11 would impress most people. He seems to have a steady practical approach to the problems of the people. I am very concerned about the other choice. Hillary Clinton I have found that she may claim the good of the people but she is sponsered buy some of the largest corporations and most powerful business men in the world. Wal-Mart, Tyson Chicken, Rupert Murdoch, David Rosen, Willie Tan just to name a few. Now this will really make so people mad but jump on the info highway and you'll find these things to be truths. Hillary was very intrested in Marxism in her younger years. Now thats not to fashionable so better not to let people know but her graduation speech from college had a marxist view to it. Here are links to some intresting readings about Hillary. There really isn't a choice. For myself if this persons elected I'm leaving this country and I am a die hard American.
2007-05-24 01:22:34 · answer #2 · answered by Frank G 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for Rudy Guiliani because he sounds exactly like Sylvester the Cat from Looney Tunes.
2007-05-23 22:53:24 · answer #3 · answered by Candidus 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Although I'm NOT voting for Rudy....
It'd be hard for anyone to be worse than Georgie
2007-05-23 22:57:03 · answer #4 · answered by JohnnyBoy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think the only reason he's even a household name is because he happened to be Mayor of New York when 911 occured
2007-05-23 23:01:47 · answer #5 · answered by vote_dummy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even worse than Bush? I don't understand what you Dems are talking about...I think he's fine.
2007-05-23 23:35:03 · answer #6 · answered by DeborahDel 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I won't vote for him, that's for sure. I don't think he'd necessarily be worse than Bush, but he certainly wouldn't be BETTER! Ugh...let's have a liberal this time around. Please?
2007-05-23 22:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by lafemelle 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋