do you think the apollo moon landing was a hoax??? If so, why???

Question

hey nrao_kid, dont treat me like a stupid. I just wanted to know what other people think. If you read carefully my question, you would note that I'm not asking if the landing was fake or not. I just wanted to know what other people got to say bout this. I've read a lot of things about this, and I'm sure the landing WASNT a hoax. Every accusation has been explained by the NASA. Learn to answer questions!!!

Answer 1

It surely is a hoax

If it was real, then why they have not sent any other persons since then. If they have sent at that time they would surely have sent many trips till now.

Answer 2

C'mon, Mario. Get your lazy brain crankin' 'cause there's too much proof out there that the deed didn't just happen once, but a half-dozen times. Not only did the Russians monitor the whole thing, but lots of journalists, professional and amateur astronomers, amateur radio operators, mathematicians, physicists, etc., etc. from all over the world did, too. These are people who had a whole lot more to gain proving that the moon landing didn't happen if something didn't appear right, especially the Russians. They conceded the moon landing, and they weren't dummies.

Now, nearly forty years after the fact, somebody's trying to sell you a "tabloid class" book that disputes why no stars in the astronaut picture, when they should know cameras couldn't get the stars to come in on the picture without totally over-exposing the moonscape and the astronaut together.

Do more of your own research. That way you'll be less naive and ask better questions.

Answer 3

I think it was real. The main reason people think the landing was a hoax was the film that everyone saw on tv. It wasn't a direct feed from the moon to a television station. It was a camera that had a direct feed to NASA which then was recorded by the tv cameras which made the quality worse. So today when people are scrutinizing the video of the first man on the moon, they are not taking into consideration that video cameras aren't like they are today.
Another interesting thing about the landing is what was said. The quote, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." isn't what was actually said. He said it so fast, and taking for granted the audio quality of the recording device, that most people missed the actual saying. He actually said, That's one small step for A man, one giant step for mankind."

Answer 4

a million) It could not. Which is why it did not. The best time the flags moved in any respect was once even as in touch with an astronaut, and for a little while afterwards as a result of momentum. two) Learn anything approximately pictures, and this thriller is defined. The digicam irises have been set to appropriately reveal foreground items - the lunar floor, the astronauts, the automobiles, all of that have been brightly lit by means of the solar. This gets rid of any threat of stars being uncovered within the identical body. three) If it were feasible to get an outline of the touchdown websites, I'm particularly definite that soil disturbance from the descent engine could had been obvious. When one is correct on most sensible of a few matters, they are able to be rough to peer. four) The Van Allen belts aren't so extremely radioactive that a spacecraft containing men and women cannot get by way of them, in the event that they achieve this swiftly, and by way of a low depth zone. The spacecraft hull offered enough defense. five) That is relatively astounding, is not it? Chalk it as much as the efforts of the 1000s of persons who diligently labored to make the Apollo missions as trustworthy as they would had been, to triple redundancy, and to the "0 defects" application that was once in position on the quite a lot of brands who developed the vessels. My father was once an inspector on the plant in which the steering approaches have been developed, and I realize good that he did not permit any shoddy workmanship to depart the plant. He knew that lives and our countrywide delight have been using on it. Mars, being so much farther away than the moon, is a a lot more complex goal. 6) Has it happened to you that they have been dressed in heavy area fits, with heavy backpacks? Together, those further over one hundred kilos of mass. You would possibly say that that is lower than twenty kilos at the moon, and that is actual ample, however as soon as it is in movement, it could nonetheless have precisely the identical momentum that it could have on Earth. Add to that the quite a lot of gear they carried and the mass of the samples they accumulated, and it is effortless to peer why there have been no 10 foot leaps. Also, has it happened to you that, at the moon, 1 / 4 of one million miles from any support, they would had been inspired to transport approximately carefully, in an effort to restrict injuring and even killing themselves?

Answer 5

Nope they were really. I am 100% sure. I mean I could see faking it once but 6 times would have been rediculous. plus if it was fake some NASA person would have wrote a book about it.

Answer 6

No.
I saw it, millions of others saw it, thousands of technicians and scientists were involved in the space effort for years before the first moon landing in 1969.

Answer 7

I feel it was 100% true, however a friend of mine saw the conspiracy documentary and there is no way he will accept it happened. He just will not take any point of view other than his own. In his mind the documentary is above scutinary.

Answer 8

It's not a matter of opinion. We have solid proof - moon rocks and the laser mirror left behind. Solid proof.

People who deny it are either conspiracy nuts and/or have a poor understanding of basic astronomy and physics.

Answer 9

No...I have a fully functioning brain. :D

Answer 10

nope it was totally real