How many airliners would a terrorist need to fly into a nuclear power station, to contaminate most of Europe?

Question

rcsdvd - It would be great if we didn't have to put up with your American twaddle!

This is a U.K. issue about the future of our energy needs - nothing to do with the FBI.

My question was intended to stimulate debate on the possible future investment in nuclear power in the U.K.

But I guess you would need some insight into the affairs of the planet outside the USA to understand that!

Answer 1

Why? You making plans to do it?

Answer 2

Don't be bothered by many of the American responses you are getting. We Americans are among the least informed & most naive people on the planet.

There are many Americans who actually believe the US is always "Right" & "Good", and that other countries should follow OUR lead, since we live in the "best country in the world", so everybody should learn from us - morally, politically, economically, socially, etc.

We Americans never think we are "Wrong" or "Evil", and that we could actually learn A LOT from other countries, and that maybe we DON'T live in the best country in the world.

Your question relates to Alternative Energy. We Americans consume the most energy (2X that of average Europeans, but with roughly similar standards of living), using only 1% alternative fuel sources. Sweden is attempting to cut oil use by +50% by 2020 (their stated goal is 0% oil), and Denmark already gets 20% of its energy from wind alone, and is actually a Net Energy Exporter.

Any intelligent solution to resolving the Energy Situation needs to be dealt with on 2 fronts: substituting supply with renewables + reducing demand = to move towards sustainable energy economies.

Nuclear Energy is technically non-renewable, so it is not viable Extra Long Term, although short-term it can be seriously considered. Unfortunately, it can't be used as a transportation fuel (except for ships), which is what's needed to substitute for oil, which is used for +95% of all transportation.

The answer to your original question of how many airliners a terrorist needs to fly into a nuclear power station is... zero.

You don't need a terrorist, all you need is a Government that wants to frame "terrorists" so that it has a reason to invade the Middle East & secure access to the largest oil-producing region in the world, with the 3 biggest oil producing countries of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Iran. Sound familiar?

911 = Inside Job. 2 planes hit the WTC, explode, burn & weaken steel, incinerate passenger + hijacker bodies, cause the WTCs to collapse... and then Atta's passport is found at Ground Zero UNSCORCHED & UNDAMAGED?

Plus, his luggage containing flight instruction manuals, a Koran, and a will is the ONLY passenger's luggage to get "mistakenly" diverted from the flight, so it is found later???

Plus, NONE of the hijackers were caught on videotape at ANY of the departure airports (the media released one of Atta departing from Portland, not DC), either passing through security or boarding???? WTF????

There are too many holes, unanswered questions, and impossible coincidences in the Official Government Story. Any American who does not ask the questions is either being Lazy, or else is too drugged with mainstream propaganda, and buys into the naive argument that no Government or group of individuals would kill their fellow countrymen to start a war - when people have been doing exactly that throughout human history. Killing people, and then framing other people for the crime, & then getting what you want. Talk about terrorism.

Bin laden denied responsibility. Why do that if you are the leader of an "extremist" Muslim terrorist group who is bent on defeating the Imperialist Americans? 911 would have been the greatest victory ever for Bin Laden, and he would have become a hero - and yet he denied responsibility.

Bin Laden denial + footage comparison of "confession video":
http://www.dc911truth.org/index.php?p=evidence1b

Plus, the FBI doesn't link bin Laden to 911:
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

Explanation:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060610&articleId=2623

Most Americans, however, are not courageous enough to look the available evidence RIGHT IN THE FACE and admit that something's wrong with the Government Story. They'd rather 1) go to war, or 2) be against the war. Those are the easy answers, and the easy way to see the world. When the true criminals of 911 are NOT the terrorists, but our very own People. That's just too tough for most Americans to even consider.

Answer 3

they say that if Flight ninety 3 that went down in Pennsylvania on 9/11 had hit the three Mile Island reactor it would have rendered a number of of the Northeast uninhabitable for generations. i'm no longer confident that TMI wasn't the terrorist's objective. Why have been they flying so low on a right away direction quarter-hour from the reactor formerly the passengers supposedly took down United Flight ninety 3?

Answer 4

They say that if Flight 93 that went down in Pennsylvania on 9/11 had hit the Three Mile Island reactor it would have rendered much of the Northeast uninhabitable for generations.

I'm not convinced that TMI wasn't the terrorist's target. Why were they flying so low on a direct path 15 minutes from the reactor before the passengers supposedly took down United Flight 93?

Answer 5

Look this is not a good question. Each European nation has a good Air force and a nuclear reactor is very well protected.
I think Nuclear energy is a very good idea. Terrorists are cowards. No interesting debate on contaminating Europe can be had by sane people.

Answer 6

Let us put it this way, there is always a way to blow up a nuclear powerplant either with an airplane or by other means. You would need a couple of airplanes like those which crashed into the world trade center to really make a blow. But one would probably be enough to create a nuclear fallout. Just rest assured this will not easely happen, if it happens it does for a reason. SO let us work on our governments to stop being threatening to other countries, enhance communication with the 'enemy', ';cause you don't kill who you are friends with:)

Answer 7

Can't really answer that mate but i will let you know that your door will be about to fly off the hindges shortly as you have just hit multiple watchword flags on the FBI system. You are dodgy!!!

Answer 8

Just one, if it was a Russian-built reactor. A US-built GE reactor would withstand any existing airplane hitting the containment building.

Answer 9

first of all with great difficulty and second i dont think you would be able to get near it and third why did u ask this question in the first place.

Answer 10

Congratulation,Your IP adress has just been reccorded by Yahoo.