I am going to play devil's advocate -
Certain persons say that they wish to have the freedom to choose what they do with thier body -
I agree - everyone should have that right
But the so called "pro choice" movement wish to have the right to decide what happens to someone else's body -
They wish to impose thier will on another - To kill another body - They will not afford that person a choice to life - They decide that someone else's body may or may not live at thier discretion
This is not pro choice - this is one imposeing it's will on another
If they were true to the title they wrongfully claim I would support them - The "pro choice " persons however represent themselves to the public in hypocrasy -
-------------------------------------------------------
Back to the flip side
Everyone wants to be right and everyone should get over the need for you to live as I do -
If there are gods if there are not gods - It's you that has to answer to them just as I do - Who am I to interfere ?
The world has been in wars for thousands of years because 2 people don't agree to live as the other wants them to
Now thats sad isn't it ?
2007-05-23 14:47:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is pro-abortion, not pro-choice. I wonder which libbie thought that one up?
Why do liberals want to prevent education of those seeking abortions? Given the importance, one would think that they would want a woman to make an informed decision. What are Libbies afraid of?
One should be educated as to what an abortion is before making such a life-changing decision.
I doubt that you really know much about fetal development and what an abortion entails. (suction, salt, scalpel, how nice).
Next time you get a big cut, pour salt in it and see how it feels. Now imagine feeling that pain over your entire body. Maybe cut off a limb or two just to see how it feels. Make a hole in the base of your skull and vacuum out your brains. You think all these things feel good?
Now, maybe you can relate (ever so slightly) to the unwanted baby being aborted.
2007-05-23 16:55:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes that is what it is Choice. Should the states not have the choice weather abortion be legal or not? Everyone acts as if you over turned Roe vs Wade it would ban abortion, that is so incorrect, it would only go back to each state and they would decide weather abortion should be legal or not. Example: Missouri may have abortion and Arkansas may not. Like it was before the federal government got involved and screwed everything up like they do with everything.
But the one thing to remember is that it took 2-people to make this baby, if she decided to keep the child and the man doesn't want anything to do with the child why is he responsible for the child by law. If she decides not to have the child why should she not have to consider his feeling?
2007-05-23 14:44:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eric R 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Abortion is a unique act in which a person knowingly terminates a life.
What alarms people about this "choice" is that life is extinguished.
UPDATE:
Eric, you are right. Under the Constitution, states can allow abortion on demand if they like. Nothing in the Constitution however says that they HAVE to.
Roe was an example of some really messed up judging.
2007-05-23 14:43:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Consider this for a moment before solidifying your opinion regarding abortion.
I believe certain people
(Much like yourself) shouldn't be allowed to produce children.
I believe laws should be made to prevent it so that you never can.
Failing that, I believe that rather than beating you to within an inch of your life I should be allowed to punch you in the stomach and save mankind from the indignity of yet another person like you and the unborn child from you.
Even if I disagree with abortion I believe that there should be justice.
If you get an abortion, nothing happens. If I punch you in the stomach and kill your baby I get life in prison.
Why should you be allowed to murder innocent people who haven't even been born yet and why should I not?
How is that justice?
2007-05-23 14:44:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What Choice are you talking about?
hasn't this choice been taken in the first place? I mean when the intercourse already took place and the enjoyment was fulfilled?
i do not believe that it is the woman choice, it is the child's choice, does he want to live or not...
and there is always the choice of adoption... but never kill the poor and helpless child
2007-05-23 15:42:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by the orphan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
professional decision. i do no longer precisely approve abortion as a ethical decision, yet i think of that if a female desires to get an abortion, she could have each and every top to. i could by no ability get one myself except there replaced right into a controversy that could desire to be risky to me and/or the toddler (including ectopic being pregnant) or if I have been ever raped (God forbid). I additionally think of that no count number what the regulation says, genuinely everyone seems to be usually going to prefer abortions. i could lots somewhat have those human beings get their abortions performed in a sparkling enviroment via a doctor who is familiar with what the hell they're doing than in some decrease back alley with a coat hanger.
2016-11-26 21:40:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by magallanes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, but the CHOICE they (the abortion crowd) want people to be able to make is to kill another human being. they aren't CHOOSING chocolate vs. vanilla or what pants to wear, the CHOICE is whether or not to murder a child.
2007-05-23 14:39:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by videocrew 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't you mean ProAbortion? I mean the word prochoice is like putting lipstick to Rosie ODonnell
I pwn Liberals
2007-05-23 14:43:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For those who believe abortion is murder, there really is no choice.
2007-05-23 14:39:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brand X 6
·
0⤊
0⤋