I have been here only two days and have found 99% of the questions regarding divorce, property settlements, pre-nups, child custody, support and visitation, and probate have the same issues. a lack of factual data on which to offer a valid opinion.
That's why I am wasting a question to try and help those of you BEFORE posting.
If you have a question regarding one of these issues then please do yourself and those who may try to help you a favor and supply the following:
Were the two of you married?
In what state was the custody, visitation, divorce and/or property settlement issued (court order)
If pertaining to a child, and unmarried, did the father sign an affidavit of paternity?
If pertaining to a child and married, was the child born within 6 months of being married or divorced?
If visitation, what does your order state regarding the issue?
2007-05-23 14:30:13 · 3 answers · asked by hexeliebe 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
you will have an attorney read the question but do yourself a disservice if you do not provide facts to help in determining what the best course of action might be.
Also, the more emotion you place in your post, the less relevance you may receive. So step back from the computer, ask yourself how you would explain your issue to the judge, then return and type.
The issues are very complex and state specific so the more FACTUAL data you provide the better service you will receive.
2007-05-23 14:31:57 · update #1
The problem with that Arthur is that the majority of the answer I have seen regarding the issues I posted here have been completely wrong or, as in one case, advising the poster to commit a crime.
That is unacceptable. As an attorney I have an obligation to empart correct information that is relevant to the issues asked and to the state in which the issue resides.
Unless you are an attorney, or the person answering the question is an attorney, they should not be giving out advice as I have seen here.
A classic example was a person who responded that if the non-custodial parent can't pay support they can file for a modification and receive it.
That is not only false in all 50 states but gives the poster a false sense of the law and wastes a lot of time and money pursuing such advice.
If someone doesn't think their issue is important enough to state facts then they will continue to be advised by someone who is not qualified.
2007-05-23 14:50:10 · update #2
FYI the people on here will give the info they believe is enough to ask their question. Sometimes you just have to read between the lines and when answering their questions if they feel you believable they will contact you off Q&A for more info. You wouldnt believe how many people I have or am helping off this website because they didnt want to give what they felt were private data. If you know what youre doing on here they will seek you. In fact I have many that I am helping that never ever asked a question on here but saw one of my answers. You do give an important message but dont expect many will listen. Theres always more here than ever meets the eye. Thank you for your observation and opinion here.
2007-05-23 14:42:47 · answer #1 · answered by Arthur W 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, since yours was not really a "question", I will "answer" with my own question. This pertains to Standard Visitation Guidelines......Let's say the Mother's regular weekend was May 4th, then the Father's regular weekend would be May 11th but since it was Mother's day, the Mother gets the child, then the Visitation Guidelines say the Father gets the child on the weekend following Mothers's day (18th)(which would have originally been the mother's weekend)....Does the Father then get the child on the 25th which would have been his original weekend? And if not, then that would mean the Father gets the child on the 1st of June, the court papers state his "summer visitation" begins on the 9th of June and then Father's day weekend is the 8th of June, which causes the Father to have the child 3 weekends in a row......
The Mother disagrees with this....how does this get resolved?
2007-05-24 08:34:27 · answer #2 · answered by Lori W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of of you may desire to in no way factor out the verbal settlement to him, or each and every individual else indoors the destiny. If he to attempt to persue visitation you in basic terms isn't waiting to resign him, whether, he may well be to blame for lower back infant help owed to you if he is going that direction. i comprehend which you do now no longer think of of that he reward visits and that i agree, yet he remains her father and legally he has each and every suited to bypass to her no count selection selection what you think of. I basically went indoors the technique an identical factor and have self assurance it or now no longer he have been given visitation after many some years of being out of the image. i might desire to propose which you hire an invaluable criminal expert if he's persistant. i choose for you the stunning, yet i've got not got self assurance you would be waiting to resign him if that's what he fairly needs to do no count selection selection what the settlement between the two one in each and every of you. The courtroom docket is a stressful place and believes that slightly one reward the two dad and mom reguardless of the previous... stable fulfillment!!
2016-11-05 04:34:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋