as difficult as finding those WMD's in Iraq?
2007-05-23
14:20:45
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Dirty Martini needs a "group hug" and another martini.
2007-05-23
14:38:06 ·
update #1
fla5232 - no women, no blacks, no hispanics. "No propaganda" on my part - just the facts. Watch your next Republican debate.
2007-05-23
14:40:46 ·
update #2
Shane - that is the wuzziest answer I have ever heard.
2007-05-23
14:42:33 ·
update #3
Shane - you are right - but you are still a wuss to think that America should conform to the notion that other countries would see us as weak if we had a women president. Consider this, "W" set the bar so low that finding a woman, any woman, to run should be easy for the Republican Party.
2007-05-24
12:38:19 ·
update #4
Smart Republican = oxymoron
2007-05-23 14:25:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
10⤋
The Republicans have plenty of smart and strong women to run for president, but the key word is run, a woman must first want to and actually enter the race before she can run for president. Condilezza Rice could run and she be a strong canidate, but she doesnt want to be president, so first find a woman that wants to run for president then start asking questions.
Stop being bias against republicans and assuming things based on Democrat propaganda, its just not smart and says that you don't put thought to what you hear and say.
2007-05-23 21:27:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by fla5232 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I am against the election of a woman into power at this point in time. While I am not sexist, a large portion of the world is and having a woman in power would be viewed as an act of weakness by them. If you don't think we should care what they think, keep in mind some have missles and are waiting for an excuse to launch them.
While they underestimate American women's strength, I do feel global politics are not ready for an American president to be a woman.
Just my opinion though.
note - I am sure you meant 'wussiest', but it does sound like someone is wearing their ovaries on the outside.
2007-05-23 21:27:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
You need to be more than smart & republican to get on the republican ticket. You need to be well-connected, and you need to want the job. That's a surprisingly small pool.
This coming election, you also have to be willing to play 'sacrificial lamb.' You see, 'losers' rarely get elected, or even nominated, if they try again and the chances of a republican being elected in 2008 are virtually nil.
2007-05-23 21:32:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Condi Rice decided she doesn't want to deal with the hate a Republican President has to put up with from liberals. Who can blame her. I see the Dems have got a woman running. Good thing you weren't looking for "smart" there. Most of us call Hillary by other names.
2007-05-23 21:24:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
Do the Dems? Oh, I forgot......you consider Hilary smart. That's funny. Hilary couldn't even get her Health Care off of the ground before pissing everybody off. Competent? In whose dreams?
2007-05-23 22:45:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Republicans don't have anything to prove to anyone. He or she who wants to run, does. Guess you missed the news reports about those chemical missles found too, didn't you ?!! Or do you always ignore information that contradicts your view of wonderland ?
2007-05-23 21:37:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
THERE ARE TOO MANY TO EVEN MENTION WHO ARE SMARTER AND BETTER EDUCATED THAN HILLARY
Elizabeth Dole and Kay Bailey Hutchinson make Hillary look ridiculous. Get an education.
2007-05-23 21:31:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Does the democrat party have an intelligent woman running for president? i think not....
2007-05-23 21:30:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by D.C. 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Connie Rice
2007-05-23 21:23:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Angry EX-DEM 3
·
6⤊
3⤋
Wow....Republicans are so non-sexist/non-racist, they don't feel the need to parade a token representative of every minority group around.
2007-05-23 21:34:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by evans_michael_ya 6
·
3⤊
1⤋