There will be more terrorist attacks on U.S soil if a republican does not take office! Rudy Gulliani
2007-05-23 14:01:23 · 13 answers · asked by sally sue 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
And he knows this why? Because it was set up by a republicans last time? The republican party has been manipulating all this information for a long time trying to scare Americans into voting for them? The terrorist actually want a republican in office because it helps them rile up thier buddies more when they have so much more corruption to point out?
I don't know, just a guess. Rudy gets a thumbs down from me.
2007-05-29 06:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by Penny K 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
he is right, if a democrat is elected, the country will be run by the ACLU and attorney's that believe the Terrorists have rights and that the police shall be the ones to prosecute the enemy.
Do people not remember how many attacks on the US or military during the clinton administration? Do not be short sighted.
So Sayeth the Impaler!
2007-05-30 14:04:06 · answer #2 · answered by impalersca 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sensible warning. Al Qaeda #2 said this:
Al Qaeda Sends a Message to Democrats
December 22, 2006 2:28 PM
Brian Ross and Hoda Osman Report:
Al Qaeda has sent a message to leaders of the Democratic party that credit for the defeat of congressional Republicans belongs to the terrorists.
December 22, 2006 2:28 PM
In a portion of the tape from al Qaeda No. 2 man, Ayman al Zawahri, made available only today, Zawahri says he has two messages for American Democrats.
"The first is that you aren't the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen -- the Muslim Ummah's vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq -- are the ones who won, and the American forces and their Crusader allies are the ones
Zawahri calls on the Democrats to negotiate with him and Osama bin Laden, not others in the Islamic world who Zawahri says cannot help.
"And if you don't refrain from the foolish American policy of backing Israel, occupying the lands of Islam and stealing the treasures of the Muslims, then await the same fate," he said.
And Al Qeada was training for 911 during Clinton's administration.
2007-05-23 21:05:54 · answer #3 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Based on history, I would have to say that Rudy has a point. Eight years of Clinton, eight years of attacks on American facilities and Clinton did little or nothing. Who is the frontrunner to be the Democratic candidate in 2008? Hillary, a watered-down version of Bill but without his charisma. If we are attacked again, will Hillary retaliate or do nothing like Bill did?
2007-05-23 23:47:03 · answer #4 · answered by John W 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
A Republican was in office on 9/11. Rudy was a good mayor of NYC. . .I don't think he would do well as President.
2007-05-23 21:05:12 · answer #5 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If I vote for his butt do I have to choose between the left and right cheek. If I voted for the right cheek would that mean that I lean more conservative but if I vote for his left cheek would that make me more liberal?
2007-05-29 17:14:05 · answer #6 · answered by bhopefull 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He did not threaten anyone. However, Bin Laden threatened any state that supported Bush in the '04 election. We will have more attacks if we do not have leaders who are willing to go to all lengths to protect us.
2007-05-28 18:36:49 · answer #7 · answered by TAT 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I happen to agree with him. The democrats are weak on terror. We all saw how Clinton responded after we were bombed over and over again over our seas. He did nothing
2007-05-23 21:06:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Its just cheap scare-tactics, and its going to blow up in his face one of these days.
He doesnt have a snowballs chance in hell of being elected.
2007-05-23 21:12:02 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Its not a threat, its a statement of fact.
2007-05-31 00:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋