English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What do you think the chances are of another "attack" just prior to the elections ?

Do you think the next "attack" will be used to impose martial law ?

Will Bush try to find a legal loo-pole to stay in power past his term ? For instance if people running for the next term were attacked and killed by a terrorist - would that be enough for martial law and Bush to stay on - durring this "emergency" ?

2007-05-23 12:09:19 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

captaino…

I think it would tone them down for a while -

2007-05-23 12:14:47 · update #1

17 answers

Yes, some of us are expecting to see some cities nuked before the end of this year, and the events will be more false flag operations. The purpose will be so that the Illuminati can establish and declare Martial Law, which has been their goal all along. But, if we are wrong, and it doesn't happen, we will be glad that it did not happen. Unfortunately, that will not eliminate the very real possibility that it was just postponed until a later time, and there is no way that the lack of incident at this time, could ever change anything regarding 9/11 either. The Illuminati, may have a different puppet in mind for this election, and may not want Bush to stay. We cannot second guess the actions of the Illuminati, but you can be sure that whatever happens is what they wanted to happen. They will do whatever suits their purpose at any given time, and they could very well postpone something, if they feel that they have lost the element of surprise, to too large an extent, for example! LZ

2007-05-23 18:54:35 · answer #1 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 0 0

I think that Bush is too impotent right now. In a couple of weeks he will tuck his tail between his legs and enjoy a 2 month vacation in Crawford while this Iraq fiasco continues. The Iraqi puppet government has already informed Bush that they are taking a 2 month break from duty. That's just super considering our troops are there losing their lives and sanity. Everyone should be allowed to go home for a couple of months. If you believe in Bush's surge, you are delusional. Troops are there so companies like Cheney's Halliburton can make a safe escape.

Who knows what Bush has promised any of the Mideastern countries? He may have already given Iraq to Iran. He desperately wanted Afghanistan for the oil pipeline out of the Eastern Euro countries but Putin has beat him to the oil reserves. Bush has been under the terrible advisement of Rumsfeld and Cheney. We all might need a bomb shelter before this is over with! Look at the pitiful inconsequential Tony Blair who partnered with Bush? His terrorists are a bunch of good ol' British boys, reared and educated in British neighborhoods and schools. Tony was powerless against homegrown terrorism.

The US needs a quick change of leadership for the world to calm down and take a breather. We are the greatest nation on the planet but there has been such a loss of power and credibility thanks to the Republicans' blind support of these oddball jerks, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld.

Until these worthless characters are out of the way we can expect all manner of attacks against Americans. I am sure Rudy was promised the Republican presidential nomination but Republicans should play their cards smarter this time around in 2008.

2007-05-23 12:39:26 · answer #2 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 1 1

i think of conspiracy's are relaxing and all yet i do no longer see the income. in any way in any respect I do exactly no longer see the income of a central authority attacking it self. As for the potential honor and glory of Bush, thre isn't any. Any Democrat might have gained the 2008 election. that's how adverse Bush replaced into. His presidency is why the Republicans could no longer get a vote. the honour potential and glory are all imaginary issues, very like the 9/11 degree conspiracy. All imaginary.

2016-11-05 04:14:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

9/11 is questionable. Some are just afraid to question it in fear of being labeled "anti-american". Bush does have everything in place for martial law, don't expect the mainstream media to tell you, they're too busy talking about paris hilton and american idle. Bush did sign a directive for emergencies apparently gives authority without congressional oversight.

2007-05-23 12:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1 0

I think that if the public gets too vocally anti-war, they might stage another attack to shut people up and "get them in line." It's a tactic that's been used over and over again in many countries over the millennia.

2007-05-23 12:19:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Nah that wont happen, they cant get all the candidates, and besides i dont think that Bush is going to impose martial law.

2007-05-23 12:16:56 · answer #6 · answered by Proud Michigander 3 · 0 2

NOPE

Bush is to busy milking money from everyone through HIGH gas prices. He wants to make as much money for friends and family before he leaves office.

2007-05-23 12:12:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You can sit around all day and say what you "think" but if your words are not supported by education and knowledge, then you're just talking out of a part of your body you shouldn't be.

2007-05-23 12:23:23 · answer #8 · answered by maggi r 4 · 1 2

People who think 9/11 was staged by the government ?

NEED TO GROW THE HELL UP.

2007-05-23 12:22:49 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 1 3

You sound like you have a wonderful imagination. Keep asking questions.

2007-05-23 12:17:45 · answer #10 · answered by Clown 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers