2007-05-23 09:59:28 · 22 answers · asked by ovraclover 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Jury is still out... there are pros and cons on both so if I had to decide today.... KERMIT T FROG
2007-05-23 10:07:33 · answer #1 · answered by KimmieLinh 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary
2007-05-23 18:31:31 · answer #2 · answered by 2fine4u 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the choice is only those two then Barack.
It takes time to get good at most things so I think he is too young too be nearly as evil as Hillary. :)
Perhaps Luke can still turn him away from the Dark side of the Force. LOL
2007-05-23 17:05:20 · answer #3 · answered by Skeptic Rob 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure wouldn't be Hillary. What brains could she have to let a man disrespect her nationally and not have enough courage to walk away. She gave the American Women the message let a man do whatever he wants fidelity is nothing.
2007-05-23 17:03:47 · answer #4 · answered by Luv2no is in the house 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both candidates are not qualified to lead a country. Hillary is borderline socialist and Obama has no experience.
2007-05-23 17:04:38 · answer #5 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Obama. He's been against the war from the start. Hillary is part of the problem.
2007-05-23 17:03:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Before I make a choice between the two, can you tell me what have they done for America???
yes. Zero and Zero. so I will not vote for neither of them.
2007-05-23 17:22:46 · answer #7 · answered by Samm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Barack. But i would rather have Rice Sec. of State.
2007-05-23 17:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather vote for Kucinich, Gravel, or Ron Paul. But if I had to choose I'd choose Obama because FOX's Rupert Murdoch isn't fundraising for HIS campaign!
2007-05-23 17:09:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would be happy with either one but if I had to choose, Barack.
2007-05-23 17:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by acfahmy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋