Because dems go easy on terrorists.
2007-05-23 09:01:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank Dileo 3
·
5⤊
7⤋
I've never heard that, but if terrorists really said it, it's probably because they hate Bush. He represents a country that they despise. And guess what? Liberals hate Bush too. So they agree on something. Many people, terrorists included, think that liberals are anti-America. And guess what? The terrorists hate America too. Another thing they agree on. But in the end, terrorists are simply crazy and their words, unless threatening, shouldn't be looked into so deeply. They're a bunch of brainwashed cowards.
2007-05-23 09:08:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dash 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
i don't doubt it. They comprehend what the Democrats are announcing, and that i'm not announcing this to speak undesirable proper to the Democrats working for workplace! there are a number of first rate Democrats...however the platform the present ones look working on is pulling us out of the midsection East completely. i don't think of all people realizes why bin weighted down particularly hasn't been stumbled on. most of the international places in the midsection East are a breeding floor for terrorists. they are indoctrinating their babies with hatred in the direction of the U. S., and in the direction of Israel. i could be keen to guess that bin weighted down is in a sort of terrorist friendly international places, that we gained't enter devoid of the two instituting a draft, or extra international places starting to be a member of in. we gained't take on the full international...and the full international seems to have fallen sufferer to complacency.
2016-10-05 22:03:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the Democrats don't like fighting wars.... Their constituency is usually made up of military type families. Bottom line is; most democrats are Blue collar. Most Republicans are White collar. Democrats win elections when we are in a prolonged war...
Terrorists win when Democrats start calling for troop pullouts. Why do Terrorists want us out?
2007-05-23 09:02:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by larryrickman2000 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Since bin Laden said he attacked us because of our military presence in the Middle East, I would guess it's because Democrats don't believe in forcing their beliefs onto someone else.
Conservatives would be fine passing legislation to make their beliefs law, regardless of another's beliefs or opinions. Democrats would prefer to give you the freedoms that are the foundation of this country.
Also, Democrats believe in diplomacy, not shoot first, shoot some more, and then force them to follow our commands. The problem is, you consider it placating the enemy, when, in fact, Dems would never have gotten us in this mess to begin with.
2007-05-23 09:08:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by genmalia 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Chickenhawk (also chicken hawk and chicken-hawk) is a political epithet used in the United States to criticize a politician, bureaucrat, or commentator who strongly supports a war or other military action, but has never personally been in a war, especially if that person is perceived to have actively avoided military service when of draft age.
The term is meant to indicate that the person in question is cowardly or hypocritical for personally avoiding combat in the past while advocating that others go to war in the present. Generally, the implication is that "chickenhawks" lack the experience, judgment, or moral standing to make decisions about going to war. Often, there is a further connotation that "chickenhawks" falsely believe that their support for military action is a mark of personal courage analogous to actual combat, thereby demeaning those actually serving while elevating themselves.[1]
The term was first applied to vocal supporters of military action who were perceived to have used family connections or college deferments to avoid serving in previous wars, particularly the Vietnam War. In current usage, the label is used almost exclusively to describe ardent supporters of the Iraq War who have themselves never been in combat; it is seldom if ever used with respect to supporters of the (more broadly supported) war in Afghanistan as such. Those who use the term are generally but not always on the political left; most factions or individuals labeled "chickenhawks" are members of the U.S. Republican Party. The label is not usually applied to women (who traditionally are not expected to serve in combat). People who use the term have not necessarily been in the military themselves; people labeled "chickenhawks" have sometimes served in the military, but have not seen combat.
2007-05-23 09:05:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Anyone can read this online in world wide news sources. Only an idiot refuses to believe this truth. The terrorist know the D's are weak on defense and can get another foothold here in America like they did in the Clinton years.
=
2007-05-23 09:03:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
because terrorist corporations makin weapons murdering millions of people win whether Reps or Dems win. In the US, the terrorist military industrial complex always wins.
2007-05-23 09:02:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
wanna give some sources on that one? and even if they did whats your point? just cause democrats want to pull out of a war doesnt mean we will be less safe.
2007-05-23 09:11:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by go 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
That sounds like a statement straight from the Republican propaganda machine. Got any verifiable sources that a terrorist actually said that?
2007-05-23 09:03:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by beren 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Because they are on the same level as far as the war is concerned they both want us away from there. So they can build up their forces and attack us again just like 9/11. We are preventing that right now.
2007-05-23 09:02:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by JRock 2
·
3⤊
4⤋