I've been reading alot of zacharia sutchin....its interesting stuff..
2007-05-23 08:43:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Zacharia Sitchin has some really fascinating theories, and he does provide proof as to the possibility of their being real. At least he tries to offer some sort of explanation as to the great mysteries of ancient civilizations, and he does point out some things that no one else bothers to. Ex: parallels between Mayan and Egyptian pyramids. Given how little we know about the true capacity of the human brain (did you know we use only less than 10% of our brains?) and the truth about the human race's adaptability, I say anything is possible. ;) I think we are a little more than just super-evolved monkeys, and I think there is a lot more to the world and its creation than we give science credit for-when you look closely, it's too precise, too perfect, for it to just be random. I like Zacharia Sitchin's theories and I believe in some of them; I just don't go talking about them a lot because most people would think I'm nuts. *lol* But I admit they have molded my views and opinions on religion and where we come from.
2007-05-23 08:54:14 · answer #1 · answered by Saiph 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Blessings to all, Nice and interesting question.Some times i wonder are we specimens being studied in a Petri dish? And is the whole Earth a part of some grand experiment? I agree with you, some remote viewers sensed a spiritual mantle that encompasses humans and aliens alike, or all life forms across the universe, that upliftment of consciousness and unification of all species is the goal. Perhaps humans are behind in genuine spiritual awareness, so we could use a push from "above," so to speak. Peace and Light to all.
2016-04-01 04:32:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Why would I believe that? Because a nut who believes that aliens created the earth with no real evidence whatsoever aside of his vivid imagination wrote a book?
2007-05-23 08:52:49 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because there is too much genetic junk in our genome. Only 2% of our genome actually is involved in protein production. The rest is an evolutionary vestige of ancestral species. If we were genetically engineered, why put in all of this genetic junk that makes it look like we evolved over billions of years?
2007-05-23 08:58:55 · answer #4 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That was the theme of the movie 2001, a Space Odyssey.
2007-05-23 08:48:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep were just little fish in a big bowl and Somewhere there looking at us saying why do they keep running around like there chickens with there heads cut off.
2007-05-23 08:52:03 · answer #6 · answered by Scott 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's someone's petri dish. The mathematical complexity alone is...incomprehensible to me. This is all something's grand plan.
2007-05-23 08:55:23 · answer #7 · answered by America scarica 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, that is an excellent 'metaphor' for what 'life on earth' is ... but ONLY if God is the 'scientist' and we are his 'experiment' ... with the 'end' of the experiment, being 'life in Heaven with God' ...
2007-05-23 08:48:12 · answer #8 · answered by Kris L 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't believe that
2007-05-23 08:50:55 · answer #9 · answered by Silent Kninja 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋