English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok so if you haven't figured out i'm using a simulator
and i'm in create teams mode on an older simulator so there's some new players that aren't on here but i picked the best of what i have to recreate a best of A's best of Reds world series. if the player ever played for the organization and is on the game i picked them (whoever's best)....

so who do you think will win?

here's the line ups....

oak.

1. r henderson cf
2. c lansford 3B
3. j canseco rf
4. m mcgwire 1B
5. r sierra Lf
6. m tettleton c
7. f thomas dh
8. m gallego 2b
9. w weiss ss

bench:justice, macfarlane, baines, d henderson, blankenship

pitchers: stewart, appier, eckersley, honeycutt

cin:
1. b larkin ss
2. c sabo 3b
3. e davis rf
4. k mitchell dh
5. p oneil 1b
6. k griffey jr. cf
7. r gant Lf
8. b roberts 2b
9. b santiago c

pitchers: rijo, smiley, dibble, myers, charlton, l smith

i'll tell you who won when i pick best answer... comment on the real 1990 w.s. if you wish....

2007-05-23 08:27:59 · 8 answers · asked by pooperscooper 2 in Sports Baseball

8 answers

the 86 Red Sox

2007-05-23 08:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by Red Sawx ® 6 · 0 3

Oakland will win the simulated series in 6 games and the final score of game 6 will be 8-6.

2007-05-23 09:06:16 · answer #2 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0 1

Fantastic, I love simulator questions. Only one problem, Griffey Jr. wasn't on the 1990 Reds. So what you have is a moot point, seeing as your facts aren't straight. Anyway, based on YOUR rosters, the A's win. too much power, too much incredible pitching, and cincinnatti is a power hitter's ballpark (the Reds have almost NO power in that lineup.) Great luck on the Sim.

2007-05-23 08:44:20 · answer #3 · answered by imtheroth 1 · 1 1

A's baby

look at the power in that lineup

thomas, canseco and mcgwire!

thats insanely powerful

no pitching staff could stop that

2007-05-23 09:03:23 · answer #4 · answered by TheSandMan 5 · 0 1

In my opinion Oakland would win that series in 5 games. Just too deep everywhere

2007-05-23 08:37:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0 1

Haven't they finished playing that one yet? Geez, the '89 earthquake only imposed ten days' delay....

2007-05-23 08:54:07 · answer #6 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 1 2

man!! you are not only longwinded, and dumb, but live in the past!!! who the hell cares about 1990? the reds should not have won it!! this is 2007, dummy! start looking to the future and not the past, like youare in the twighlight zone!!!!!!!!!!

2007-05-23 08:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

THIS IS 2007 NOT 1990!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GET A LIFE

2007-05-23 08:35:04 · answer #8 · answered by simplydelicious 5 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers