I think they area drag, save McCartney" and Ram".
2007-05-23 06:03:42 · 8 answers · asked by camadida 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
my generation, btw the 60s and the 70s was there when The Beatles were still a band, that's why I don't appreciatew Paul' solo albums, save the first 2s, of course he had still talent then, he was still the Beatle Paul.
2007-05-23 08:16:41 · update #1
I don't think they even compare to what he did in The Beatles!
2007-05-23 06:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by Bunny 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is a tough question to answer, since I've always been a fan of Paul McCartney. But I have to admit I've never really liked the songs Paul has put out on his own over the years. Back in the day when he was collaborating with John Lennon, they were terrific. But either one of them alone, just didn't quite measure up to what they could do together.
2007-05-23 06:10:11 · answer #2 · answered by cynthiajean222 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sir Paul McCartney is not only a great musician, but he's genius. The Enstein of music revolution! His solo albums are great!!!
2007-05-23 06:06:56 · answer #3 · answered by Susilo N 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As good as the Beatles albums
2007-05-23 06:06:43 · answer #4 · answered by Yahoo Man 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
John Lennon's solo " IMAGINE " or Paul Mc Cartney's solo " Venus & Mars " .... don't quite make it ? Your kidding, right??? McCartney is a musical icon for the millinium ... past & present! Your generation is starting to scare me ...
2007-05-23 06:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Marie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Venus and Mars was brilliant, and Pipes of Peace wasn't so bad. Come on! He's McCartney! He can do anything. One wonders if Heather Mills posted this question!
2007-05-23 06:09:03 · answer #6 · answered by Kyle 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Damn good. Eveb his old stuff with the Beatles was great.
2007-05-23 06:06:15 · answer #7 · answered by Johnny Rocker 89 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
"Venus and Mars," and "Band on the Run" are excellent.
2007-05-23 06:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋