I would vote for any one of them.. the reason.. George Bush!!!!
2007-05-23 06:17:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Borack Obama. He'd likely be a lame duck from the start, and you know what they say about the government that governs the least.
2007-05-23 12:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by firstythirsty 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Barak Obama
Clinton is pure evil and Edwards is just not up to the challenge of the position. Algore is too busy saving the world from people like himself or creating internets.
2007-05-23 12:41:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama because he represents change, unity, and hope. He has been against the war from the start and he has been able to work with the other party better than the others.
We've seen the other candidates already. We need someone new.
2007-05-23 12:40:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Diggy 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
3. AL Gore. he has experience in Goverment and I wanted him to win the 1st time he ran. he cares about the enviroment and he is respected although he is a bit hypocritical with the eviromental issues. but it has to be AL Gore. but I would love to find a candiate who is against abortion and also against iraq war. that would be who i denfiently vote for before AL Gore.
2007-05-23 12:44:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by bunnygrl43 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would not waste my good votes on any of these losers. They do not have the guts to do what they say, and I bet you anything that if any of the above people were in office when 9-11 hit, absolutly nothing would have been done.
They would have just rolled over and played dead.
2007-05-23 12:40:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
2. BArack Obama. We need a change in this country.
2007-05-23 12:39:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Barak Obama because he is the least of these evils.
2007-05-23 12:38:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by mikehunt29 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd shoot myself if those were the only choices!
2007-05-23 12:40:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
1⤊
2⤋