lol that is great!
2007-05-23 05:47:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by kyeann 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
If you're asking are there gaps in the fossil record, then yes. This does not disprove evolution. Fossilization only occurs under certain conditions so the record of changes that occur in species over time will always be incomplete.
2007-05-23 12:27:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nature Boy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The oldest evolutionary theory has been handed down through the Ten Incarnations theory of the Indian Mythology.Life 's beginning in water is symbolised through the Fish as the first Incarnation of Vishnu. The Second one, viz., Tortoise, represents the evolution from Water Bound life to Amphibian life. The third, the BOAR represents the fumbling beginning of land bound animals with minimal contact with water. Then comes the Narasimha half animal and half Man, with independent use of the Hind legs and also highly developed use of brain to outwit the brutal force of opponents.Vamana , the fifth one is a tiny man of barely four feet and four inches in height, but his intellectual capacity is shown as far superior to the might of Great Conquerors of brutal strength..The Sixth one, Parasuram is seen as the exponent of close Combat weapons and later as seeking to learn Missile technology.The Socirety of his time is shown as hunter gatherers . The seventh, Sree Ram is shown as still in the Hunter Gatherer Society, but trying to establish the Rule of Law and Social Mores ,though at great personal cost of credibility.Then comes the Krishna, the emancipator from dilemmasand Advocate of Duty as Primary consideration.He is followed by the Buddha who reasoned well on the causes of Human misery and the ways to get out of them through righteous path.The Tenth one , Kalki features as the Vanquisher of the Evil that threatens to envelope the world. The beauty of this evolution model is that it predicts the recurrence of the pattern many times over before the Apocalyptic version of collapse is anticipated.
2007-05-23 12:49:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
That depends upon whom the evolutionists follows: Darwin or crack-pot science.
Darwin himself said that evolution is only within a species, and the species either evolves higher, (From earliest caveman to modern man,) or dies.
Crackpot scientist are those that are (fails to find a polite enough adjective) enough to believe that man evolved from mice, monkeys, and apes.
I hope this helps.
2007-05-23 12:35:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by josephwiess 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
In my family, some say that great(x2374) grandpa Thag was a Neandertal, but others say that was just trash talk from his wife's relatives.
On the other hand, if you're worried about that farm breeding business, relax. You can't get a sheep pregnant.
2007-05-23 12:39:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by injanier 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I've found that once you get back about 1.2 million years, the birth records are a bit sketchy. I mean come on, didn't they ever here about creating a back-up for the database?
2007-05-23 13:45:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by dragonlord182 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yeah.. haven't you heard. We are all cousins to Poop throwin monkeys.
Sheesh... Evolution is like something out of a comic book.
No wait.. I don't want to insult comic books.
2007-05-23 14:02:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by tlcbaotou 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
only in your family tree.
2007-05-23 12:21:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kannan J 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Frankly, no...
2007-05-23 12:22:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋