Is this just a new way to distract from the quagmire in Iraq or is there really something new in this recent declassification? I mean is it really news that Bin Laden is still planning attacks against the US? And doesn't this just make it clearer that the administration should have made Bin Laden their Sole focus after Afganistan? Doesn't this just make clearer their errors?
2007-05-23 05:04:05 · 13 answers · asked by Kwame M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is not news to those who have paid attention all along...and when will some people understand that if we invade whichever country he happens to be in at the moment that we will have to occupy the ENTIRE Middle East...reports show that he never spends more than a few hour's in any one location...how many hour's would it take before Democrats and Liberals turned your idea into a Bush bid for WORLD DOMINATION?
2007-05-23 05:15:27 · answer #1 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Exactly. Besides, he brought this intel out in support of the war IN IRAQ - the intel says bin Laden was/is planning attacks OUTSIDE Iraq.
I don't understand why he bothered releasing this intel. Did it change anyone's mind???
2007-05-23 05:20:25 · answer #2 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
India and Russia proportion confusing emotions against Pakistan. this is no longer something new. and that they are the two allies of america. China would not step in. they have have been given way too plenty to lose and honestly no longer something to learn. Afghanistan has no potential or backing, so as that removes them from the equation. And Bo Jangles is an extremely, very honest source of education.
2016-10-31 04:35:29 · answer #3 · answered by cabaniss 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yawn... Bush makes the case that al Qaeda can't attack the USA, as they lack the resources to do so. Face it, if there were educated suicidual Arabs that could be sent here, they would be sent. If there were Muslims in this country to recruit to carry out terrorist attacks, that would had happened a number of times since 9/11. Conservatives got nothing but empty paranoia, not fear about terrorists.
2007-05-23 05:15:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think this will surprise anyone. I am surprised that Bush would say this and not take action. Why are we in Iraq when Bin Laden is in Afghanistan or Pakistan. Bush continues to dig a bigger hole for himself.
2007-05-23 05:12:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is news because everyone has been trying to pretend Bin laden has no power and cannot accomplish anything hiding in a cave in Pakistan. This information has nothing to do with Iraq. It is just a reminder that terror is still present and the fight continues.
2007-05-23 05:11:09 · answer #6 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush and Cheney need support for another attack on another sovereign nation (Iran) that is absolutely NO threat to us at all whatsoever.
By the way, Bin Laden was suffering from terminal organ failure and was on dialysis 6 years ago. He's probably dead now.
Bush is a lying POS.
........
2007-05-23 05:22:34 · answer #7 · answered by ladykofnyc 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are dragging the Bogey man out of the closet in hopes of scaring the sheeple and diverting attention away from the Iraq war, the Alberto Gonzales scandal, the immigration lack-of-reform bill, etc.
It merely proves how incompetent this administration is.
2007-05-23 05:11:42 · answer #8 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You may be right about the quagmire but you're certainly right about planned future attacks. My question is why the surprise?
2007-05-23 05:13:23 · answer #9 · answered by Don W 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not big news to me. We're still tracking terror cells. We just need to know who we can trust to report them to. So far some of the government heads have proven they can't be trusted.
2007-05-23 05:13:16 · answer #10 · answered by Mindbender 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋