Every team in the world are fixed in match-fixing.
2007-05-23 16:19:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nobody knows for sure whether it's still exsisting or not. It may be not at this time though. Match fixing is not the case in the third ODI.
Pakistan was playing against SRi LANKA. which is more less were the better team before starting the series. SRI LANKA woked up after the two defeats. I dont believe changing players helped Sri lanka a lot because some of the new comers to the team perform really well except one or two. Every international team when they put a eleven players to the field they should be the best eleven of that country. If not, then they can't do aftermath weeping and blame on the new players.
2007-05-24 12:25:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by kanchana99 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope !!
Pakistan had already won the series so they had given chance to other players...there were 5 changes in the team for the last match and all were youngerters who replaced serior and expereinced players...Now they were playing against Srilanka and srilanka is ofcourse the best team this time in the world..The runners-up team of world cup ..... still i won't consider it a bad defeat as they were 114/7 and they manage to score 181 or so..!! There was no match fixing....Pakistan won first two matches with their good spirit and being united under the leadership of new captain ..they were always talented ..and there is no doubt in it...the only thing required was their unity and that has been done by Malik...(looking so)..! and last match is lost becuase of the absence of their key players .....!!
2007-05-23 15:00:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ★Roshni★ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just wonder reading above answers. Except for Vikyal all of them trying to be cricket pundit. All of them are so confident as if they were also there when the match was fixed. If you look at the history of Pakistan cricket they have always played like this. When Clive Lloyds's West Indian team were ruling the world he often said that Pakistan were the only team they had to play more cautiously as their game was full of ups and downs they can beat any side of the world on their day and they can be defeated by any side any day. In the last match of the recent series the absence of key players was the main factor for their defeat and don't you forget they were playing against Sri Lankans who have just played the final of world cup. In a way all above answerers are putting down Sri Lankan team as if they are not capable of beating Pakistan. For above answerer lulu, my dear lulu what would you say for the early exit of South Africa, England in 2003 world cup? did they also fix matches. What about mighty Australians losing to Bangladesh last year? Please have a positive mind when you are answering a question coz many are reading these and they can be misguided with your poor knowledge of the game.
2007-05-23 14:27:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by dua 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes definetly there is still match fixing in Pakistan cricket
2007-05-23 09:27:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shani 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes i believe match fixing is happening still in pakistan's cricket i believe that was the reason for their early exit from the WC.
2007-05-23 12:53:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think so,even though we don't have any inside info on this....the murder of Bob Woolmer and the World Cup debacle shows this.......
Pakistan also have strong Dawood dealings, so match fixing cannot be ruled out at any cost.......
2007-05-23 10:35:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by darthsud 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do not think that they lost the 3rd match due to any match fixing, but due to experimentation by resting some of the key players and playing new players, which did not click.
2007-05-23 09:23:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
anything that happens in pakistan is always fixed by america. Cricket is no exception. pakistan is american colony.
2007-05-23 10:22:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats the only thing that is present and still intact in pakistan cricket
2007-05-23 09:22:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by kay k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋