The world's top secret agent didn't cop it was odd that the very plain girl who had been ambivalent to him for the first four hours of the movie was suddenly all over him like a rash!
2007-05-22 22:34:19 · 29 answers · asked by dave w 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Yes it was pants. I saw it at the cinema, 2 guys walked out after 30 mins, I thought I'd give it a bit longer and ended up watching all of it and when I left I felt really disappointed and annoyed that I just spent the best part of £50 taking my gf out to see it.
The first 10 mins were great. I won't be going to the cinema for the next one, I'll leave it a few years and watch it on ITV or BBC at Christmas.
2007-05-22 22:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it was poor than some Bond movies. The opening sequence is so brilliant the rest cannot compare.Falls flat I'm afraid. I think the Bond girls were forgettable, the bad guy is boring.
I did not feel anything with the characters in this one.
But I think the whole point of this movie is to show the change in Bonds personality.I will say that at the end of the movie we see that Bond looses his humanity and just becomes cold, when he walks up...(I won't give it away)
2007-05-22 22:45:57 · answer #2 · answered by Lazarus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sean Connery is the One True Bond, but even so, sorry, can't agree. We had a great time with it. And you have to be the only person on the face of the earth who thinks the gorgeous Eva Green is *plain*!!!! My BF practically kisses the TV when she's on. And Daniel Craig's blue-laser eyes, not to mention that bod - wow!
2007-05-22 23:48:22 · answer #3 · answered by Nightlight 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not like any of the James Bond films and my fiance was so desperate to see this film so I rented it out for him and sat through it. The only good thing was Daniel Craig and the numerous half naked shots. We both felt the film went on a bit too long and that it was just lots of gun action and explosions without the gripping storyline. By the poker match, I was very bored.
2007-05-22 22:44:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I watched this last night actually. It was good and more toned down (less pastiche) than most Bonds - Eva Green is stunning - but you probably like them big busty types - never mind. I thought it was a bit too long though. Daniel Craig did well in the part.
2007-05-22 22:46:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very poor bond outing.
First 25 mins and the last 25 mins were excellent.
In between was just an extended version of poker on bravo.
Much prefer the peter sellers/david niven version.
2007-05-22 23:55:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't know if you've noticed but most of the Bond films have been fairly shallow as far as plot and character development is concerned. But, you don't don't go coz of the film's plot - you go for the fantastic locations, the escapism and the drop-dead gorgeous ladies (hubba-hubba).
It's a fantasy world - don't take it soooo seriously, man
2007-05-22 22:46:41 · answer #7 · answered by cornflake#1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Casino Royale wasn't so bad, it's a different look at the genre. My all time bond movie will always be thunderball. but Casino Royale wasn't so bad.
2007-05-22 23:36:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolute Rubbish
2007-05-22 22:43:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I thought it was excellent.
Its the best bond film since Goldeneye.
And Daniel Craig is the best bond since Sean Connery!!!
2007-05-22 22:47:42 · answer #10 · answered by Euan S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋