2007-05-22 14:10:19 · 20 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
That's what they say!
2007-05-22 14:12:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess the bird in the hand is a known asset.
The two in the bush are perceived possibilities that may or may not become an asset.
Banks loan money on what you presently have. Not what you think you will make next year.
2007-05-22 21:15:25 · answer #2 · answered by Snaglefritz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A hand in the bush is certainly worth two on the bird......
;-0
2007-05-22 21:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather have a bird in hand with a bush.
2007-05-22 21:14:06 · answer #4 · answered by Concerned 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Two birds in a burning bush, means we get to eat, and since it's burning, we just might be lucky enough to have enough more birds to go with every loaf of bread. Which makes me think. Was Jesus a bush?
2007-05-22 21:19:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well yeah
You have the one in your hand
The two in the bush will just fly away and then you will have nothing
Be happy with what you've got
(not you personally...the collective you)
2007-05-22 21:14:17 · answer #6 · answered by Andrea / Princess Bitchalot 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-05-23 10:35:26 · answer #7 · answered by dwmatty19 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't drink Bush, I think better of myself.
Oh you mean, like can I ask a stupid question and have someone respond to it?
Then NO
2007-05-22 21:19:01 · answer #8 · answered by kevrigger 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It depends what kind of bush they are in
2007-05-22 21:14:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if i could catch a bird with my hands id be thrilled, so yeah
2007-05-22 21:13:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes!
2007-05-22 21:12:56 · answer #11 · answered by victor y 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋