What are some key points that about 9/11 that prove it was a controlled demolition that brought down WTC?

Question

What do you believe? Some starters...
1) Steel melts at about 2700 F, burning kerosene ranges in temp form 800 - 1500 F

2) A third building also "colapsed" next to WTC because of a supposed fire...why was so little heard about it?

3) The two buildings were pulverised, or basically turned into dust, in their own footprints, and the walls imploded...something seen only in a controlled demolition.

Those are some points I have come across...does anyone know any others?

Answer 1

Google "reopen911" or go to youtube.com and type the same thing. Watch all the videos

Answer 2

It's well-known that steel loses most of its strength when heated by a simple fire, especially a jet fuel fire. Every steel-frame building in the world has plaster surrounding
the steel to prevent it from softening in a fire. Indeed, even the steel frames inside the WTC was coated with “fire-proofing” (plaster). Why do you think they did this? Just to waste money?

When you heat steel in a simple fire, it doesn't melt, but it becomes like soft taffy. You can't hold up 100,000 tons of weight on soft taffy. Remember: The steel beams are not just sitting there for cosmetic reasons. The beams are supporting fantastic amounts of weight.

Now, in a fire, the plaster fire-proofing will only last a limited time. Unfortunately, the WTC towers had "sprayed-on" fireproofing that was hard to apply and which got knocked off by the jets. The steel softened from the fierce fire. Then it bent as 100,00 tons pressed down on it. The floors sagged. This pulled in the outside columns.

==> Photographs show the columns bending inward. This is absolute evidence of steel weakening.

Then the columns snapped (broke) inward & the remaining column sprang outward. This caused the building to collapse.

==> If this could not happen, then everybody wouldn't be wasting their money "fireproofing" steel.

See: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/... for a nice movie explaining what happened.
---
Any other "evidence" of an inside job is just as easily explained.

Answer 3

1. Ignore the fact that no control demolition ever took out a building from the top.

2. Control demolition requires weeks of cutting and bring in tons of explosives that no one saw.

3. Ignore the structural engineers and those who design the building plus the combine work of MIT all understanding the collapse was due to the steel heating up and looking most of it ablity to support the weight.



Here is real good point to think about.

Spend more time on the reality it was Muslim terrorists and not Bush.

Reality is so much better.

Answer 4

WTC had more than just steel and kerosene; aluminums, other metals, jet fuel, plastic, other potential fuels in building materials, chemicals, electrical components...etc. Can you give me list of everything that was in WTC?
Are you telling me WTC only had steel and kerosene inside?

WTC 7 had huge hole created by flying debris from WTC collapse. See this gapping hole.
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

These are skyscrapers. Skyscrapers are mostly empty space and not very strong in order to reduce weight. Or it will collapse on its own. And it didn't just fall into its own footprint. It looks that way because WTC is so tall, but debris went everywhere. You don't remember thick cloud of dust covering entire Manahatan area? Demolition don't spew out dust out that far. See more photos here.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html

Answer 5

There are NO points that 9/11 was a controlled demolition. Try screwloosechange.com or NOVA to find out the truth.

Answer 6

Clearly you are another product of our public school system. It is impossible to have been a controlled demolition. You need to go back to physics class and math class.

If you want proof of your ignorance, check out the Popular Mechanics article debunking the 9/11 myths.

Answer 7

Reality is US went to Iraq knowing that Iraq didn't possessed Nuclear weapon.
Reality is Iraq has no connection whatsoever with Al-Qaeda
Reality is soldiers don't know what they are doing in Iraq.
Reality is Bush lied to the people of USA.

Reality is so much better. Yeap!

Answer 8

Drugs are bad okay

Good Point Here

Steel doesn't have to melt before it loses its ability to support that kind of weight.

Answer 9

Steel doesn't have to melt before it loses its ability to support that kind of weight.

Answer 10

You don't need any key points, just make up anything and you'll believe it, good grief, some of us were there and know controlled had nothing to do with it.