English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just wondering...

2007-05-22 13:14:28 · 16 answers · asked by Lety L 1 in Arts & Humanities History

16 answers

Reverting to urban warfare and throwing away the blitzkrieg war that nearly brought the civilized world to its knees.....i'm speaking of his little fight on the banks of the Volga in the winter of 1942.....all the other blunders mentioned above paled in comparison.

2007-05-22 17:31:24 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 1

There are many, many examples of his incompetence. As an example, he was obsessed with eliminating all "undesirables" from Germany. So, even though they wasted precious fuel the military could have used, the transports to the concentration camps kept on going back and forth. Another one was putting himself in total command of Germany's armed forces. He had absolutely no knowledge of how to command an army properly, and even though he was a veteran of the First World War, he was only a corporal. Third, he made the inexcusable mistake of fighting on multiple fronts. This means none of the fronts were being supplied adequately. Fourth, he drew men and equipment from the Eastern Front to participate in the Battle of the Bulge. What the Russians were doing during the Bulge is rarely mentioned in history books, but most sources indicate they were halted to stock up supplies for a future offensive. If the Russians had been aware of the state of the depleted German lines in front of them (they might have been), they could have punched serious holes in the lines (it's possible they did).
Fifth, he declared war on the United States shortly after Pearl Harbor. If he had not declared war on the U.S, it's possible we would have focused our attention solely on Japan. Sixth, he thought he could have beat Russia before the winter set in, so he did not prepare for fighting in the snow. As a result, cold-weather items were in very short supply during the invasion. He also did not appreciate how quickly the Red Army could bounce back after the invasion. Seventh, he alienated local populaces (especially in Russia) with brutal occupation policies, whereas if he'd been friendlier, the locals would have readily helped out German soldiers, and (who knows) possibly resisting liberation by the Allies.

2007-05-22 17:03:03 · answer #2 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

The obvious answer is that he overestimated the value of human life and underestimated the goodness of humankind.

Miltarily, he valued quality over quantity. So, while the Allied forces were cranking out cheaper, slower and less manuverable tanks and planes, Hitler and his "supreme race" were slowly building only a few very expensive state-of-the-art tanks and planes.

While Hitler was busy making sure that everything was "just-so" and better than ever. The Allied forces took our crude and clumsy tankers and destroyed Hitler's oil refineries. Therefore he had no fuel to run his fancy machines.

Hitler lost the war because he literally ran out of gas.

2007-05-22 13:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Lordd Virgil 3 · 0 0

1.) Underestimating the RAF and the British radar.
2.) Attacking the USSR in summer instead of early spring and convincing himself that Russia is not a challenge.
3.) Alliance with the Japanese - the only reason why Germans have war against the US.
4.) Not listening to his top notch generals.

2007-05-23 01:47:40 · answer #4 · answered by this is madness!!! 3 · 1 0

the main important mistake is between the main obvious. historic past shows us time and time returned, in no way get entangled in a land conflict in Russia. Hitler first made the blunders of establishing up a 2 front conflict in 1941 by ability of attacking the Russians. Granted, England became slightly preserving on, however the reality maintains to be that they have been. as quickly as the USA joined, Germany had reached this is attrition component, and easily did no longer have the supplies to maintain a 2 front conflict going. regardless of the shown fact that, as an further little twinge to this question, I propose you %. up the e book "How Hitler might have gained international conflict II" by ability of Bevin Alexander. In there, he asserts that had Hitler attacked into British Palestine and captured the oil prosperous center East, (each and all of the jointly as denying the allies that perfect same commodity,) he might have decrease off the British in North Africa, meaning no ships interior the Mediterranean, meaning Axis administration of all of Europe, meaning placed one interior the win column for the Nazis.

2016-11-05 01:32:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Holocaust

6 million dead people that could have boosted the war effort. The effort required to control them. The holocaust was #1

#2 Making the Axis Powers. He wasn't fighting a 2 front war as other posters suggest. He was fighting 3 front war. Italy was nothing but a drag for him. He would've been better off with neutral countries to his south.

#3 Not convincing Japan to attack Russia from the East, instead of attacking Americans at Pearl Harbor. They could've ripped Russia into two.

You can fight a 2 front war The US did in WW2

2007-05-22 13:18:22 · answer #6 · answered by Kilgore 3 · 0 2

Declaring war on the United States on September 12th, 1941.

At the height of WWII Nazi Germany was the size of Oregon with a population of 60 million. Dragging the industrial might and larger population of the USA into war was Hitler's really biggest mistake.

2007-05-22 13:38:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

1. Fighting a war on 2 fronts
2. With a damaged infrastructure they didn't have enough fuel
3. Germany was out manufactured....we made more planes, tanks, etc. than they could even though they built better items.
4. They relied on the enigma machine for codes, and had grown careless.

2007-05-22 14:01:55 · answer #8 · answered by Alex 6 · 0 0

Failure to finish off Britain before invading the Soviet Union

2007-05-22 17:36:44 · answer #9 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2 0

opening a front against against russia while the western front was still open.
Should have taken malta and gibralter as part of the plan to take crete.
.

2007-05-23 05:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers