English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-22 09:16:43 · 18 answers · asked by georgia gurl 2 in Sports Football (American)

18 answers

At the very least he knew about it, he had to be bank rolling it. Over 60 dogs, that's around $100.00 for dog food everyday. 36 grand a year in dog food and his house, he knew. I hope they come down hard on him and I live in Atlanta and like the Falcons!!

2007-05-22 09:40:39 · answer #1 · answered by Ray s 1 · 0 0

Innocent until proven guilty. They don't have anything concrete yet to connect him. People keep seeming to miss the point that just because he owns the house doesn't mean he lives there or knows what goes on day to day. Football players aren't like regular people they can own houses and plausibly not even go there or know whats happening at the house. Sounds like Vick was trying to help his family out but letting them use his property to make money raising dogs. And they turned it into something illegal.
Dogfighting is a really disgusting activity and it will be really sad if Vick was involved. He has been clean to this point. That water bottle incident turned out to be nothing. The flipping off the fans thing all I can say is the people heckling him asked for it. Until they say he is guilty then I say hes not.

And why is everybody taking what Portis said so serious? I had to laugh at that article mentioned above. Portis is a jokester. Anybody that knows anything about him knows that.

2007-05-22 16:40:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If it wasnt Michael Vick would any of you people even care? Probably just the die hard animal lovers but no none of the rest of you would. So shut up already. And no he isnt guilty until he is proven guilty in the court of law.

2007-05-22 18:05:35 · answer #3 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 0 0

yes, i believe he is and i hope they come down hard on him. Hopefully a jail term is in his future i hate hearing about animal brutality. Did anybody see that article about Clinton portis defending Michael Vick. What a chump Portis is he left Denver for money and cant do anything with the horrible redskins. If you weren't mad about this story before read what this numb skull thinks about dog fighting. He was cheering it on. He must think you can torture animals. They are both a bunch of dumb idiots they are the kind of people that you hope end there careers on injuries or just plain being stupid.

2007-05-22 16:31:05 · answer #4 · answered by Chris b 3 · 0 0

I think he's guilty, and at the worst time too. They Shaub, they missed out on David Carr, and now he'll be suspended. Maybe Joey mught be able to live to 1st round expectations with that O-line, but I hope not, given I'm a Bears fan.What he did was so stupid. He's not getting charged with possession of pot! Instead, he'll be guilty of dog fighting

2007-05-22 17:58:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think he's at least guilty of allowing it to happen. He's a pretty shady guy. Those Vick brothers both need to learn how to act like human beings.

2007-05-22 17:44:07 · answer #6 · answered by DuffMan409 2 · 0 0

Yes, I think he is guilty of training dogs to participate in dog fighting. I've been following this story before the media got a hold of it.

2007-05-22 16:24:10 · answer #7 · answered by hardcoco 6 · 0 0

He has conspicuous canine blood stains in the back of his house. His friends all do the dogfighting bit. And the police were there for a warrant on Ron Mexico's drug use, so if they have evidence of illegal dogfighting they aren't making it up. I think he is, but let the court system do its job for once.

This weird athlete Michael Vick loves to see things suffer. It may be him next.

2007-05-22 16:23:00 · answer #8 · answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7 · 0 0

I think he's guilty of being a #1 as*hole. I hope he's found guilty of dog fighting.

2007-05-23 00:00:12 · answer #9 · answered by stan l 7 · 0 0

If he wasn't a participant in it, he sure knew about it. Which makes him a party to the crime. He certainly should be held accountable to some degree. He's acted above the law for some time, he needs to realize he has to follow the laws just like everyone else. He's a total punk.

2007-05-22 16:40:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers