I mean I read the other day a logger lost his arm because whack job environmentalist made a trap in a forest to hurt anybody cutting down the tree. They will justify their actions by defending a forest, but what is more important a forest or a human life?
2007-05-22 08:18:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
sybil, it was my brother
2007-05-22 08:47:26 · update #1
Sybil I wish it was your head that got taken off
2007-05-22 09:06:56 · update #2
Anything is more important than human life to an environmentalist.
2007-05-22 08:34:04 · answer #1 · answered by Scheidemann 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Even the most ardent environmentalist deplore and strongly disapprove of tactics that injure, maim or kill loggers.
Extremism suits no one.
First, it does not serve the cause well. ("Save a tree. Kill a logger.") A vile and pernicious sentiment and one I will NOT subscribe to. [NB: I actually saw that bumper sticker]
Second, you alienate those people that you want to bring into the cause
Third, you create a rallying point against what you strive towards.
I feel that you can balance the two requirements and no one need die on either side of the argument.
2007-05-22 15:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all environmentalists are nuts. I myself try to do my part for mother earth, but you won't see me hacking off body parts.
2007-05-22 15:29:17 · answer #3 · answered by germaine_87313 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not all people who care about the environment would do that kind of thing. there are bad ones in every group
2007-05-22 15:22:11 · answer #4 · answered by hot carl sagan: ninja for hire 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's only one.
2007-05-22 15:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by Dash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋