2007-05-22 05:50:34 · 9 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Both are currently brain dead.
2007-05-22 05:57:33 · answer #1 · answered by capu 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They both were against terrorism, how do people see Bush as a criminal. Both U.N. and CIA stated it was likely that Saddam had WMD's. The Clinton mentioned attacking Iraq as well in 1998 stating that they also believed that Saddam had WMD's.
To respond to another post Bush and Truman are not a war criminals, what did they do to be called that?
Also, Where should we fight the al-Qaeda? Bush had the intent of protecting America from another attack. Afghanistan did not attack us why are we there.? Here's the problem al-Qaeda is not a country so it is hard to fight them.
Truman and Bush both realized that there are possible threats toward us.
Yes Saddam had every aspiration to attack America. He ignored many resolutions that could have easily avoided this.
Far-left people, not necessarily Democrats, believe that Bush is a bigger terrorist than bin laden and Saddam. How?
They believe Bush did the 9/11 attacks, none of the evidence shows that.
2007-05-22 13:16:32 · answer #2 · answered by cmbeattie007 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a lot closer to Falsman than Truman
2007-05-22 12:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George W. Bush is no Truman. I am a republican but I do not care for our president . I do know he is not a coward but other than that he is not a very good president better than Clinton but not much.
2007-05-22 13:09:06 · answer #4 · answered by cowboyjim376 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes both were thought to have been failures while in the white house, and just as history has some what rehabilitated Truman so will it treat GW kindly
2007-05-22 13:07:07 · answer #5 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're both war criminals so I understand why George keeps comparing himself to Truman.
2007-05-22 12:53:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No,
Truman could pronounce his words.
2007-05-22 12:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. once a wannabee always a wannabee. he wanted to be a great president fighting a noble war, instead he's a liar fighting a pointless war of his own creation. I wonder if he understands that "greatness" can neither be bought nor created.
2007-05-22 12:59:04 · answer #8 · answered by Alan S 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
no.
2007-05-22 13:04:38 · answer #9 · answered by Jane Z. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋