I wouldnt do it, you would probably have to drop too many valuable people in order to pick up these sub-par people.
Dunn and A. Jones, as said before, are .avg killers, neither will hit above .240 this year. Kelly Johnson is showing his true form now in his current slump. Wickman and Gonzalez are two pickups that wont help your team at all.
Id say this is a bad trade, keep Pujols
2007-05-22 04:46:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by jimboxyz1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
4 Braves and Adam Dunn...huh? I would probably keep Pujos. He is a top 5 player even though he started slow this year. Andruw Jones and Kelly Johnson are quality players. Dunn will get his power numbers but might hurt you in other areas. Wickman is an accident waiting to happen and Gonzalez is on the DL. Plus, Gonzalez seems to be behind Soriano for saves in Atlanta. It really depends on what the rest of your team looks like. If you don't need some of these players, keep Pujos. Good luck.
2007-05-22 03:53:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by cubswin03 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wll Pujol´s is really stinking right now although in the end he will post similar numbers as in other years. Andrew jones is also havin a terrible start but again will improve dramatically as he has done in previous years, then you have Dunn.... Think about it Pujols can post about 40+homers with 120+rbi´s and 300+average, you are getting a great deal since Jones an Dunn can also bat around 40 homers eachand drive in around 120 each ok average wise is not the same but you´re also getting 3 more players that you can trade for specific purposes such as stolen bases or perhaps a pitcher. go for it man!!!
2007-05-22 04:01:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by frank 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me get this straight. You were offered those 5 guys just for Pujols. I would definately say yes without knowing what your team looks like, but you should look at your team and see if you really need those guys that you are trading for. If you already have a goo outfield then you don't really need Dunn and Jones.
I recommend looking at your team and deciding if you are going to start all the guys you are getting in the trade, if not, then don't trade pujols.
2007-05-22 03:55:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kevin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't do it. Dunn and Jones are average killers, you're buying high on Johnson who's very unproven despite a great start, Gonzo's on the DL, and Wickman could lose his job to Soriano. Plus you're going to have to drop 4 guys to accept it. Who would those guys be? The person you're trading with will most likely pick some of those guys up, making it closer to a 5-for-3 trade rather than the 5-for-1 it seems.
2007-05-22 03:52:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by GOB BLUTH 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
sure you may get wins with different waiver twine pitchers Pujols is a device on the plate whilst does the guy strike out? Santana is super and all yet i might take Albert over every person in fable baseball he's the wonderful participant too undesirable he's barely 1B or utility
2016-10-31 02:22:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldnt do it just for the logistics. Can you afford to cut 4 guys? Plus, while Johnson is playing well right now, he is a rookie, or near enough to one, and therefore an unknown quantity. Wickman is coming off the DL, and Gonzalez is just a set-up guy now. Keep Pujols.
2007-05-22 04:44:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by dkiller88 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Would you do it for Jones, Dunn, and Johnson because that is pretty much all you are getting.
2007-05-22 06:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brandon R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Note that 4 of the 5 are white guys!
2007-05-22 04:12:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
.Jump on this one, Pujols is the best fantasy player but this offer is too good not to take
2007-05-22 03:45:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋