I feel for some of them, but in some cases the soldier is not doing what they are supposed to do.I gained custody when my ex left the state of Texas w/ son w/o notifying me or the courts that he had been re-assigned to another base.(is this not his responsibility)Anyway,he left, I had to go thru Red Cross to find where he went, I thought he was in National Guard, turns out he had reinlisted as fulltime army w/o telling anyone.When found him, found out he was going to Iraq for a year from his superior.I called my attorney, he drew up papers.Ex lied to judge, said he had no orders to go to Iraq, judge called ex's superior, & he verified it. Judge gave me custody, temp. Not because he was being deployed, but because he had not followed prior orders.We went to court when ex returned after 1yr, he decided our son could stay w/ me. 1yr later go back, he wants him now, and jusge gives son back to him, even though he's over 8,000 behind in Child support. What's up w/ that? more details below
2007-05-22
02:32:07
·
2 answers
·
asked by
LISA R
1
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
My real ? is, are there not soldiers who use the fact that the govt. is on their side to get their way? Aren't judges making decisions in some cases based on bias? My judge just came into office, I'm sure he doesn't want to shake anything up by letting my son stay w/ me, cause he knows my ex will go straight to newspaper and discuss how he lkost custody because of fighting for his country, which was not true reason he lost custody. What do you all think, any one in similar situation?
http://video.msn.com/v/us/v.htm?f=msnhom...
2007-05-22
02:32:30 ·
update #1
The court ordered a social study thats verdict came out in court: it said my son would be better with me, judge still let ex keep son.
2007-05-22
03:31:17 ·
update #2