Get behind the President's initiative and lets gain a victory over the terroist.
2007-05-22 02:12:00 · 18 answers · asked by Dave B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It is the duty of Congress to oversee what the executive branch does.
Are you suggesting that they do not do their duty, that they roll over and play dead to this dictator!!
I'm afraid not. They are doing exactly what the Constitution requires them to do.
2007-05-22 02:17:33 · answer #1 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because, using your wording, the President doesn't own that house, he is merely guests for a couple of years. The equivalent would be the part about you owning your house, and allowing the maid to tell you what you will do and what you won't do.
If the guy down the street from you, threw eggs at your house, would you then go and beat up your next door neighbor? That same story is what the president did. Iraq wasn't involved what so ever, with the 9/11 attacks, but Bush used it as an excuse, and made innuendos about the 9/11 attacks and Iraq, and people just "assumed" that he was telling the truth...but he wasn't. He has later stated that he was "given incorrect information and passed it on", but only time will tell if he honestly made a mistake, or lied to the American people to further his cause of attacking Iraq. There are a lot of bad people in the world, and Hussein might have been one of them. But, why didn't he attack Iran, who not only are building a nuclear weapons site, but also captured and held Americans hostage for over a year? Why didn't he attack North Korea, who has a nuclear weapons facility and have killed American soldiers for years? Because, for what ever reason, Bush wanted to attack Iraq.
2007-05-22 09:22:56 · answer #2 · answered by auditor4u2007 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes we should all be like sheep and follow the president's blind initiative. There will never be a victory over terrorism..terrorists aren't a single country or race. terrorism is a tactic used by people to promote various beliefs. Mr Bush has had ample time and resources to get the people that attacked this country but instead we pull resources away from there, with the job unfinshed there, and head to a country that never attacked us nor had the capacity to do it.
2007-05-22 10:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by emt_dragon339 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because "the Terroist" is not in Iraq or at least he wasn't before Saddam was Kicked out. How stupid do you have to be to still buy into the War on Terror crap? If we were fighting a war on terror we would be pursueing the terrorists not trying to police warring tribes and getting killed doing it.
2007-05-22 09:34:59 · answer #4 · answered by leavemealone 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Um, the president has had ample time to run the war, and has failed miserably. Instead of beating the terrorists, he has created thousands more. The Commander Guy, is inept.
2007-05-22 09:48:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must be talking about Nancy Pelosi who is running around the world and country speaking and acting as though she were the President. She has done LITTLE to end the gridlock in Washington politics. She runs off at the mouth daily under the guise that she speaks for the opposition. Maybe she will announce her candidacy for President, and then we would be doubly sickened by her and Hilary.
Chow!!
2007-05-22 09:26:48 · answer #6 · answered by No one 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
1.We was all for this war when we thought Iraq was hiding WOMD...
2.Those weapons are not there.
3.The American people gave its blessing to put our men and women in uniform into harms way under those circumstances.
4.Again those weapons are not there and it is questioned if there ever was WOMD in Iraq.
5.Madam speaker is speaking for anyone that has a child serving in Iraq not to mention the wishes of the "majority" of the American public...which btw is her job!
2007-05-22 10:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by tina w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our wannabe monarch started this war over weapons of mass destruction. Intelligent people have realized that the only WOMD is in the oval office.
As for terrorists; what would you do if some foreign despot sent troops into your country?
2007-05-22 09:37:40 · answer #8 · answered by avnurd 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is behind the terrorist activity actually. CIA trained Bin Ladin, the British secret Agent. Bush's Grand Father was a Nazi Party, his name is Prescott Bush. We hope for the clean good US president next. None of these Freemason, Illuminati, Neo-Nazi, nor Christian (religious) claimed president.
2007-05-22 09:22:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Americans voted against the war
2007-05-22 09:15:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋