English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. He will not attend and boycott the event;
B. He will attend a sober celebration without any fanfare.
C. He will pull out all the celebratory jester with ballons, confetti,etc.
D. He will showcase more Hank Aaron and Babe's legacy and overshaw Barry Bonds controversial past.

2007-05-22 00:58:11 · 12 answers · asked by Sports Maven 1 in Sports Baseball

12 answers

There's no way to say what he WILL do, but I could say what he SHOULD do. He SHOULD celebrate with Bonds just as any other baseball record breaker. Why? Because Bonds is not the first player enshrouded in scandal, and he's definitely not the last. If his wrongdoing was so egregious AND proven by fact, Selig should have just gotten rid of him; banned him from the league. Since his crime wasn't bad enough to warrant that kind of action, why now attempt to deny him what he deserves, and what Selig has allowed him to achieve? Selig made this bed and he should now have to lie in it.

2007-05-22 01:45:22 · answer #1 · answered by bigjap2001 2 · 0 0

I believe D id the right answer. He doesn't seem too thrilled with Barry Bonds breaking the record, so considering that it's a historical day, why not make it historical. A little congratulations, and then all kinds of things about Hank Aaron. Especially considering how close he seems with Hammerin' Hank. And why not? He played for Selig when he owned the Brewers.

2007-05-22 01:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by scoobyscupid 2 · 0 0

i do no longer think of that Barry Bonds cares approximately what Mr. Selig does or thinks or says with reference to the occupation domicile run checklist. even however I easily have on no account met Barry or every person who has, i will't help yet experience that Barry would not shield the checklist or the sport of baseball different than the thank you to lift himself. If Bonds truly cared approximately baseball or the followers he ought to end applying the "no you will teach it so i could desire to be harmless" reasoning and only supply us all a real answer. If Bonds got here out and regarded right into a digicam and defined precisely what he did or did no longer take and why i think of i could desire to understand him plenty extra.

2016-10-31 02:11:13 · answer #3 · answered by labounty 4 · 0 0

He will turn his back on it just like he does everything else. It's all about the money and what the league is making while this cheater continues to play. If any of the so-called officials had any balls they would throw the scum bag out of baseball and replace Selig with a real commissioner.

As I've said many times before, chemically enhanced home runs don't count!!

2007-05-22 02:10:36 · answer #4 · answered by Yankee Dude 6 · 0 0

C, all they care about is making money.
I used to watch baseball when I was young not knowing how it's play.
I watched because there were no other sports on tv everyday.
It's like Americans eating McDonald's, we are used to it.
If you analysis what we eat, American's eat the worst.
The fatest and junkiest food in the world.
Baseball is the same, we watch it because it's an "American Pass time".
Pass time is right, a waste of time.
It's boring to watch on tv already, however, it's even worst at the stadium.
The only time it's exciting is when it's the World Series.
Even then, it's still boring compare to other sports.

Commissioner Selig should be fire for not keeping baseball clean.
Even with all the evidence, they still allow those asshole to play.
What kind of role model is baseball sending to our children?
They are telling children to cheap because you can get away with it.

Our congress is also to be blame. They don't care.

2007-05-22 02:00:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

"Ever loving" Hank Aaron? No offense intended to the guy, but he was getting death threats in 1974 when he was about to break Ruth's record.

And does anyone really care what the worst commissioner in the history of baseball will do when Bonds hits No. 756?

2007-05-22 01:19:35 · answer #6 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0 0

B, with a little fanfare.

D will be used by any network covering Bonds beginning with #754, because television production has no standards of taste. Aaron merits acknowledgement, of course, but Bonds -- and don't even try to deny this -- is the story here.

2007-05-22 01:39:03 · answer #7 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0 0

The home run record will look like this?
756*

Just like what Commissioner Ford Frick did to Roger Maris in 1961:
61*

2007-05-22 01:57:23 · answer #8 · answered by Yahoo Man 1 · 0 0

Actually the answer is E. He is hoping Bonds breaks his leg sliding into a base before it happens

2007-05-22 07:33:19 · answer #9 · answered by Michael1995 2 · 0 0

Who knows Selig is bout the ugliest damn person i've ever seen and to go along with his ugliness he sucks *** as a commiss so hard tellin.

2007-05-22 01:51:15 · answer #10 · answered by fcrnnngbck25 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers