English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1.) A woman who's got nothing to lose
OR
2.) A woman who's atlhetic (knows martial arts)

2007-05-21 19:31:14 · 18 answers · asked by ☆Bombastic☆ 5 in Social Science Psychology

18 answers

A woman who has nothing to lose because she would do anything because she wouldn't worry about consequences. A woman who known martial arts knows only to use it for defense, and I am sure not going to make anyone who knows martial arts feel threatened!

2007-05-21 19:34:29 · answer #1 · answered by Melissa A 2 · 0 0

1

2007-05-22 02:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by kat 2 · 0 0

I choose #1 because....

A woman who has nothing to loose is a dangerous B!+(# who has no aspect of disipline at the moment and probably has a gun!!!

A woman with knowledge in the Martial Arts can still be beat down by someone who doesn't as long as that person has good reflexes and can knock you sensless with one punch to the head or other vital places. And usually they only do martial arts with someone else who knows the same moves.. it is more like a dance than a brawl.

2007-05-22 02:43:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A woman who's got nothing to lose.
A woman with martial arts should only elicit fear in people who are malicious.

Then again, a woman with nothing to lose might be a good thing.

2007-05-22 02:34:51 · answer #4 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 0 0

If it were a guy... Probably a woman who's got nothing to lose. Cause he couldn't control you.

You could always beat him up. What sucks is he's gotta get back up sometime..

Otherwise anyone else.. I don't think anyone would fear that. I know I wouldn't care.

Unless you like woman that is..

2007-05-22 02:41:22 · answer #5 · answered by idontknow 4 · 1 0

A woman who has nothing to lose, because in most cases a woman who is an expert in karate most likely has in her credentials the responsibilty of what such an abilty entitles while a woman who has nothing to lose, has nothing to give up, rather nothing to restrain her

2007-05-22 02:54:25 · answer #6 · answered by BiG Money heavyweight 2 · 0 0

a woman who's got nothing to lose.

(i'd actually be turned on by the martial arts chick)

2007-05-22 02:42:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The woman who's athletic because the one with nothing to lose - may have nothing to fight for. The athletic one is probably fighting for something that she wants to be healthy for that is a total motivating factor.

2007-05-22 02:35:21 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

None of the 2. Because both are harmless

2007-05-22 02:43:11 · answer #9 · answered by Muthu S 7 · 0 0

A woman named bombastic.

2007-05-22 02:38:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers