These people are a serious cancer of the media. They are full of hate, always attacking the defenseless, never offers solutions, want dissenting Americans to be thrown into concentration camps, are openly rascist and homophobic and never offer any solution.
They are only there to distract the stupid and are full of disinformation. Who is worse and why?
2007-05-21 17:40:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't believe in Democrats or Republicans per se, so no; the debate is phony on a nationwide level.
Americans are being fed the carrot on the stick. It's ridiculous.
2007-05-21 18:48:27 · update #1
VENOMOUS SEETHING SNAKES!!!
They both suck!
Tough call which is worst....but I'd say Maulkin!
Watch her face when she speaks!!
2007-05-21 17:56:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
They are the best and brightest example of why people should not watch syndicated media and should do their best to educate themselves.
It's also an unfortunate and probably unintentional commentary on the state of mental healthcare in the US, clearly both women need mood-stablisers or some degree of counseling however spewing verbal vomitus on Fox will (I hope at least) be personally theraputic as it doesn't seem capable of serving any other socially beneficial purpose.
"There's a war out there old friend, its a world war, and it's not about whose got the most bullets, its about the information, what we see, what we think, how we work...it's all about the information."
- Cosmo, Sneakers
2007-05-21 18:06:02 · answer #2 · answered by Mark T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The worst would go to either Rosie O'Donnell, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi! They are the worst for America.
2007-05-21 17:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by Bunz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter. She can not defend any of her positions when confronted. The same is true of Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Brett Hume, and of course, George Bush.
2007-05-21 18:16:41 · answer #4 · answered by pussycatwannbe2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann Coulter is disgusting. She also makes me feel like she doesn't even believe what she's saying because of her shaky voice. It's like she wants to cry when she is speaking. Maybe she has been mind-controlled by Cheney?
2007-05-24 04:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by pancake on my face 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take a deep, liberal, cleansing breath and calm down. And quit listening to Ann Coulter and start worshipping Al Sharpton and Jessie. You'll feel better then.
2007-05-21 17:53:40 · answer #6 · answered by yooper4278 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Michelle Malkin is worse. At least Ann Coulter has sex appeal. But, both of them are out of line, and I will never listen either one.
2007-05-21 17:58:14 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Main Event 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Malkin is a hottie...
if the only "women" the Libs can prop up is Rosie ODonnell then I would rather be gay.
2007-05-21 17:57:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ann is a beautiful and wonderful person that is great for our country
2007-05-22 08:37:19 · answer #9 · answered by rp 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wow, you just described the democrat party.
i love michelle and ann! they do a great service for america!
2007-05-21 17:56:24 · answer #10 · answered by Mustardseed 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
oh, come on! I'd love to see Michelle go one on one with Hillary.
2007-05-21 17:56:19 · answer #11 · answered by TedEx 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋