Was colonization good or bad for Africa?

Question

Did the benefits outweight the negative impacts of European colonization of Africa or was it the other way around?

Answer 1

Colonisation resulted in huge amounts of intrastructure being built in Africa that otherwise would not exist. It opened up the continent to the modern world, and during the colonial era tribal wars were suppressed.
There were massacres by some of the colonials such as in the congo (can't remember if it was Belgium or Germany), but overall the colonial powers improved the lives of the natives.
We look at africa and imperialism from our viewpoint today, but we often don't compare imperialism with what life was like before.
These massacres and wars in Africa today are not the result of colonialism, they are the ways things were done before colonialism and it's a pity that africans are going back to that tribal warfare rather than using the examples of peaceful nations around the world to sort out their problems.

Answer 2

Since the "Europeans" didn't colonize the majority of the continent, it probably had very little impact on Africa as a whole. They may have had some impact on the various indiginous tribes they encountered, as did the other groups who "colonized" Africa. The small footprint they made had almost no impact on the continent as a whole, whereas the colonization of America (by Europeans and others) changed the face of the continent from forests and plains teaming with wildlife to major urban areas.

Answer 3

Obviously bad... The borders that European created seperate the chunks of Africa between European nations di not take into consideration different tribes, culture, or anything. The borders back then have become the basis of the modern borders currently

The ethnic conflicts in Africa are due to European colonization. If Europeans had paid attention to different tribes and such in Africa clear and logical borders could have been created instead of just taking parts that European nations wanted.

Answer 4

eu Colonization: The increasing of eu colonies and empires into the horn of Africa became the set off for lots of the failings indexed above, the unfold of Small Pox, Influenza, and different insignificant illnesses and illnesses that have been presented right into a inhabitants with little or no immunity to the alien ailment. This additionally got here approximately with the settling of the Americas and the commerce of illnesses between the two continents. persevering with, the Colonies additionally further with them technologies, contemporary suggestions and conveniences for the time, and widespread an economic equipment for Africa. This economic equipment nevertheless no longer unavoidably for the natives, bring about products and centers popping out and in of Africa, changing cultures. regardless of the shown fact that this might seem as lots a curse as a blessing, with technologies the individuals of Africa won power, and merely as in any placing all a conflict needs to take place is one guy or woman, with the in no way ending starvation for it. yet not one of the tribal wars may well be as to blame for the wear and tear executed to Africa then those related to Europe, The Zulu conflict, or perhaps international conflict 2. while many eu worldwide places united to help rebuild themselves (With the help of us of a of america besides), Africa became left relatively unmaintained after the conflict. yet A small adventure can replace the international, and in spite of that being suggested, its difficult to end if the Colonization of Africa had a good or unfavourable result. There are execs and cons to any subject, regardless of the shown fact that it relatively is impossible to derive regardless of if or no longer Africa might have been greater advantageous off. was hoping this help answer your question, and if no longer no longer less than with any luck it is going to provide help to be certain one.

Answer 5

Oh I have no doubt Africa would have been far better off without European colonization. The whole plan, as I understand it, was divide and conquer. By doing so, they only further helped to widen divisions that now cause masacres and genocides.
The boundaries were not made in thought of the peopleliving there, but of those back home. Europeans gained new acess to slaves, and the africans gained acess to guns (which the world could have done far better without).
However, the colonization did allow some Africans to further their educations in Philosophy and mathematics. Allowed some to become greater than they might have been.
And I believe that those few people, those who helped to better our world and through some chance of fate were allowed to learn, are worth all the hatred the Europeans may have ignited in their arrival.

Answer 6

it was so bad lots of people died in bad condition in mines digging for gold and diamonds, and worst of all killing them for no reason and of course SLAVERY.the Africans would of been better off with out the Europeans with all the natural resources they had. They would have had major MONEY.

Answer 7

no