If you had to save a baby or an old person from a fire, who would you save?

Answer 1

the baby would be easier to carry

Answer 2

Both, I'm He-Man.....I'd have to pick the baby.....

1. Cause the baby, you could run out of the building quickly with the baby like a football.......unlike to the heavier old person..

2. The old person has had a life to live while the baby's is just starting......

so the baby.....Unless the old person was rich...ha ha kidding....

Answer 3

I would save the baby, the old person had a chance to live his/her life. Plus it would be easier to lift and carry a baby out, I don't think I'm strong enough to carry an older person.

Answer 4

I would save the baby. They old person has lived a good life, the baby has just begun one. Though I wouldn't want any one to die. I would want to save both.

Answer 5

the baby because even if i could not save the old person they would at least try to help them selves but a baby knows no better and i would feel so bad not to save something incapable of saving its self

Answer 6

That's hard, but it also depends who they are....If I didn't know either of them I would save the baby, they have their whole life ahead of them, but if the old person was my grandmother or grandfather who I cared much about, I might save them. But at ANY chance I had, I would save both, even if it sacrificed my own life, it would be worth it.

Answer 7

The baby

Answer 8

I would save the baby. I would feel terrible about leaving the elderly person behind...

Answer 9

the baby. it would be sad to know that the baby wouldn't live to see the rest of the world, while as the old person lived their life already.

Answer 10

baby because the old person has already lived
if that sounds okay in a weird way

I WOULD TOTALLY SAVE BOTH IF I COULD

Answer 11

I figure the elderly person will DEMAND that I take the baby first and then if there is a chance come back for them....