Over here in Limey land we love George and Tony for their tough stance on terror. Just because a few wingers go on about weapons of mass destruction does not mean it was a bad idea to have a war. Only George Bush will have intelligence and courage to take the war to Iran to stop their weapons of mass destruction. America should stand firm behind George when he sends Americans to fight in the mountains of Iran.
2007-05-21
11:47:52
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Thanks for that Best of It`s always nice to hear from an as s kissing commy libtard sucking milk from the teat of osama bin Laden. The links you provide are obviously fake Donald Rumpfeeler would never have shaken hands with Sadam.
2007-05-21
11:54:24 ·
update #1
That can be arranged Mr saywhat. Do you prefer the scraped banana skins or the powdered goat droppings?
2007-05-21
11:56:21 ·
update #2
Come on Jesse T as a fellow englishman I would have you to check out background.
2007-05-21
11:57:36 ·
update #3
Quatt47 I know what your getting at bud but at least Blair gave us the "ethical foreign policy" before that we were always syicking our noses into other peoples affairs.
2007-05-21
12:00:42 ·
update #4
See that Craig l Agrees with me. Thanks for the support Craig looks like you and I are the only true lovers of freedom and democracy left.
2007-05-21
12:10:02 ·
update #5
bmxtacob has asked me tosay a few words about my own poor impoverished country. Well unaccustomed as I am I`ll give it a go. Britain was once a proud nation at he forefront of international trade. We sold heroin to China and when they didn`t want to buy it we kicked their slanty eyed as s. We trade more slaves than any other nation in history. Then came the Lib tards bas tards(used that joke already I know) ruined everything. We used to have real freedom and democracy and now where are we? Impoverished.
2007-05-21
12:57:29 ·
update #6
Oh nearly forgot nice bike Kid and don`t worry about those spots they will clear up when you leave school.
2007-05-21
12:58:49 ·
update #7
Split do whenever a brit comes across a yank they always say the current pres is a moron just to wind em up. This what your brit friends are doing to you. Seriously George Bush is more popular than Gary Glitter over here.
2007-05-21
13:44:48 ·
update #8
You must be bonkers, mate. Tony and George are the evil twins that have wrought hell on earth. The intel Bush had supposedly came from British intellegence sources. What a mess this has become. So, mate Bob's your uncle.
2007-05-21 11:56:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I live in the heartland. The only terrorists I encounter are American-born "crack-heads". They are a by-product of a society which goes out and looks for more enemies while ignoring internal issues. i.e. Hurricane Katrina
Other than the media "drumbeat", I never hear anyone talk about terrorists. Try listening to what your neighbors and co-workers have to say before a bunch of oil lobyists with an obvious agenda.
Reagan should have earned an Emmy for tricking working class people to vote against their own self interests. But working class people are only 95% of the population, so I guess their interests don't really matter.
Where's Limey land anyway?
2007-05-21 19:17:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by bmaste 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Was that an example of dry British humor, or have you lost your F..ing mind ?.
Have friends in UK & do not get the impression George is all that popular.
He's just a rich kid ,who stole the presidency & is turning the US into a joke.
Even his party playmates are looking for distance from the inevitable fallout of his "statesmanship".
Would much rather have a man like Blair at the wheel.
Tell the truth, you write comedy shows for the BBC,right?
2007-05-21 20:38:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you talk about us 'over here in Limey land' loving George and Tony I think you speak for yourself, certainly not me. Blair is possibly the worst Prime Minister we have ever had. Remember the sleaze, lies, deceptions, cash for honours, illegal war, stealth taxes, freebie holidays, misuse of government assets by his awful wife, arrogance, spin doctors, giving in to Europe, George's lapdog .... need I go on, the list is endless. As far as 'George' is concerned we have similar things along with vote-rigging/ Thank God the Yanks have him over there. The sooner these two war-mongering pieces of ineptitude have gone the better.
2007-05-21 18:57:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by quatt47 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush ,to me ,is a president who 's good at making enemies round the globe .He has done an excellent job turning the US into a big joke as well.The Americans are friendly people but they are quite naive too I should say.They should vote for a smarter ,kinder,and more sensitive person to be their leader.Bush to me is arrogant,so unkind,and not-very-bright.I liked the Blair when Princess Diana died.With tears in his eyes I was so touched by him.I don't like him anymore since he became Bush's lapdog.----I 'm neither American nor British.
2007-05-21 21:23:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by LiangMoi 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow you are on some serious crack. George Bush is a moron who does not posses the IQ to work at a texaco station. Come out from under your rock.
2007-05-21 18:53:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Q-Tip M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since you are, I assume, an English person, I want you to see where the lifes of George W. Bush came out of. I wonder if your Tony also came out of the same birth canal. http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Daily_Show_defines_term_loyal_bushie_0321.html
2007-05-21 18:53:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by furrryyy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ronald Reagan was a criminal. So, if you're judging by levels of criminality, GWB is the best since Reagan.
2007-05-21 19:02:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Craig L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he is too, but of course that isn't saying much, because the only other presidents since Reagan have been Bush Sr. who was mediocre, and the national nightmare Bill Clinton.
2007-05-21 18:52:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sam G 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hmmm...
Interesting...
No thanks. Bush is a putz who has done more to damage America than Tokyo Rose...
If you think Bush would be intelligent to take the war to Iran, than I can only debate your definition of "intelligence"...
2007-05-21 18:50:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
2⤊
0⤋