He's certainly anti-american and a traitor to the country. Maybe he should take his family and move to a country where he has his off-shore holdings. We already have 12-20 million potential terrorists and lawbreakers posing in our country. We don't need any more.
2007-05-21 11:28:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by MH/Citizens Protecting Rights! 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hmm. I studied this incident 20 years ago and at first blush it appeared to be cold blooded and nearly calculated with rumors that Kopechne was pregnant at the time with Kennedy's child. After researching though it looks more like Kennedy was drunk and panicked. As the baby of the family he was used to others handling his problems and relied on that again to his permanent regret.
2007-05-21 11:27:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alexa 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
1) Yes.
2) His name is Kennedy & the crime occured in MA.
3) Yes.
2007-05-21 11:36:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The destructive guy lost his head after an twist of fate. He did no longer dedicate homicide, he purely acted stupidly. probable as a results of alcohol or drugs, or maybe though he did no longer comprehend the place he replaced into until it replaced into too late. of direction, baing a Kennedy did no longer help. no longer one bit.
2016-11-25 23:02:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES, its why he couldnt run for president. A murderer can run for senate (and be elected and re-elected to a liberal state), but not for president.
the kennedy crime family was nothing to the Clinton crime family...behold, the Clinton Bodycount!
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/clintonbodycount.htm
2007-05-21 11:26:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
How can he be walking the streets? simple, the Kennedy name,politics and above all money.
2007-05-21 11:28:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Apparently he can. I wasn't there but his story was pretty fishy to me. I'd say that being a rich person in any country probably gives you a leg up on illegal actions.
2007-05-21 11:29:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ms.L.A. 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Guilty of manslaughter?
Probably yes.
2007-05-21 11:28:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
The evidence points towards involuntary manslaughter.
2007-05-21 11:27:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by thirsty mind 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, he might just be as big a murderer as O.J.
2007-05-21 11:29:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by amazin'g 7
·
3⤊
0⤋