Hillary Clinton has more tax and spend on the way. TEN BILLION FOR FOUR YEAR OLDS? no im not making it up!?

Question

heres the link to forestall liberal whine
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070521/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_children

quoting
She said quality pre-kindergarten programs will more than pay for themselves because children will be less likely to enter special education programs, drop out of school or enter the welfare system. She also said preparing children for school also reduces behavioral problems.
quoting
"We consistently fail to invest in what will save us money."
1.) To truly invest in what makes us money, what's wrong with the economy by giving working people back more of what they earn. They will spend it and increase the gnp making more tax revenue instead of welfare schemes.
2.)If our four year olds need to depend on the government instead of parents and families to ready them for school, isnt that symptomatic and proof postive of the FAILURE of this type of social welfare diatribe ms. Clinton is proposing?
3.)Per dollar on special ed kids, how good is a univerasal spend spree?

Answer 1

I saw that on the news. Hillary-ious. She's in a vote-driven dream world.

Answer 2

We'd already have the $$ we need if it wasn't wasted on a war that has NOT benefitted the U.S. in any way.

The government will NEVER let the citizens keep more $$$ as long as we owe the huge debt to the Federal Reserve. The $$$ being spent in Iraq must be paid back, with interest.

We are being fleeced by the Republican War President.

It's odd that you would complain about investing in the children of the United States. Your point #2 doesn't make sense either. It would mean the opposite. If parents and families were doing a good job this program would be unnecessary. Look out the window, the parents and families are failing.

BTW, what's the return on our investment in the Iraq War? It's too bad we all believed that "Mission Accomplished" meant the war was over when it actually meant the money train had pulled into the station.

Answer 3

Kids in special ed are often the result of actual illnesses or birth defects, and when they're not, the reason is usually too much or too little parental involvement in the developmental years. Pre-school is no substitute for parents, and can't reverse or prevent Down Syndrome, so what? We spend even more on our already outrageous taxes to help 13% of the kids who could potentially go into special ed get their lazy brains humming? Which costs us more in the end! Hillary, you're like a hilarious dumb-blonde in a sitcom, except you have a real shot at presidency. That's a seriously scary thought.

By the way, I don't support the war, and don't have to to criticise another turn in the wrong direction. That would be like saying I have to stumble over a bunch of bricks to learn that they can trip people.

Answer 4

Yeah, I saw this. I'm not a fan of Hillary or the idea of Liberal happy taxing. But I do have to admit, the money spent on children makes more sense than the billions spent in Iraq.

Answer 5

Dude, tax and spend is better than your boy in office, who borrows and spends. It is better to earn the money and spend it than to borrow and spend.

Bush has borrowed more money in his first 5 years in office alone than was borrowed by all previous presidents since Washington. And you'll be paying for that for decades.

Spent it on his war. How is it you can complain about programs for people and not complain about programs that do nobody any good?

Tax and spend, indeed: where do you think the government, whether Republican or Democrat, is going to get the money to pay off our "national credit card debt." From you, bud.

Answer 6

What makes you money is exploiting the 3rd world but you don't need further incentives to do that. Your people spend their money on the cheapest goods from China regardless of if produced by 8 year olds, Reaganomics proved your first point to be incorrect.
Clinton was more fiscally conservative than the Conservatives, I doubt if his wife will be though.
Anything is better than what you're spending taxes on now, installing puppet governments you can't sustain to try to control the oil market so you can all drive 4x4's and those dumb looking Hummer things...

Answer 7

How dare she spend all that money on her self serving campaign. She should be giving that money to the poor, less fortunate, starving children of this country. This is an outrage....there should be a cap on how much money she can spend on herself.

Answer 8

Though I agree that politicians are often too short-sighted, I'm tired of increased spending in education. Other countries spend way less money on education with way better results.

And please... military spending has nothing to do with this. There's no reason you couldn't reduce both and just tax people less.

Answer 9

think of this, we had 8 years of her already when Bill was "president" , do we really want this back in the White House and what would Billy Boy be doing to the interns with all his free time?

Answer 10

REpublicans have more tax and spend on the way. It is called war-forever.