English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not the WMDs from the late 90s, or the ones from the 80s, but the ones we went to war over. From the weapons program allegedly started in the 2000s?

2007-05-21 10:46:39 · 24 answers · asked by Take it from Toby 7 in Politics & Government Politics

24 answers

Oh was that the reason we went to war? There have been so many reasons since I forgot all about that. No I don't believe they did find them. The new lie is that Syria and Russia smuggled them out of the country. ( even though we were watching Iraq like a hawk, but please conservatives dont let that get in the way of what you believe, keep believing Bushs lies)

2007-05-21 10:49:59 · answer #1 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 3 3

To the best of my knowledge people are coming forward saying that they advised the president that they found NO EVIDENCE of wmd's in Iraq before the invasion. if this is true and it goes in front of a congressional committee. Maybe we can get the happy idiot impeached. Thousands have died and he opened a can of worms over there. He's put us in irreversible debt, he's made us very unpopular with the rest of the world, he very well may have destroyed the us as we know it we're heading into a depression like the world has never seen. He should be tried for crimes against humanity and swung from a rope. I want to watch the filthy retard kick and struggle. :)

2007-05-21 22:44:42 · answer #2 · answered by herbie's man 2 · 1 0

no.
Hans Blix & his fellow weapons inspectors worked hard for over a decade to put the said WMDs out of use.
he said this back in 2003.
Bush & his administration's answer was to denounce the UN, asked them to leave America & used Spin to demonise members on the UN council that voted against them!

2007-05-21 17:54:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i love the morons who try to blame democratic members of Congress.

Like they weren't lied to just the same as the rest of us were.

And oh ya, WMD's in Syria, only for some odd reason our spy satellites that can tell if you're circumcized from space can't find these things.

Uh huh. They're there tho. Maybe hiding under a tree? Morons.

2007-05-21 17:57:01 · answer #4 · answered by Josh 4 · 4 2

As far as the neo-con Republicans are concern, the WMDs have not been found, as far as the rest of the world is concern, there are and never been WMDs in Iraq.

2007-05-21 17:54:13 · answer #5 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 4 2

WMD is WMD, and it doesn't matter what time frame... Saddam used WMD on his own people. Our soldiers did find weapons buried all over Iraq, and still finding them to this day. Of course, the Lib media will never report on it.

2007-05-21 17:55:34 · answer #6 · answered by ks 5 · 0 4

No, but I think Rumsfeld got back the pair of golden cowboy spurs he gave to Saddam as a gift in 1981.

2007-05-21 17:51:08 · answer #7 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 4 1

Definately no. There's no Weapon of Mass Destruction in the 21st Century.

The last time WMD have been found is 1989.

2007-05-21 17:50:34 · answer #8 · answered by Zero Hunter 2 · 2 4

I can't believe I didn't read any Republicans respond with some statement defending the War above, wow. I guess they are growing up. Oh, it looks like there are one or two. Oh well, some of them have grown up.

2007-05-21 17:50:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

there is a hold up in the production in tennasee the gismo that makes the fufu valve work isnt big enough

2007-05-21 17:52:23 · answer #10 · answered by q6656303 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers