Equal Rights for the LIVING
Health Care
Education
Social Services
The Environment
And oppose:
War
The Death Penalty
Torture and Abuse
Imprisonment Without Due Process
Racism
Environmental Pollution
2007-05-21 09:55:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No! Cons only care about fetuses (because they have nothing to do with their care) and people on life-support (again, they don't have to spend money on their care). Taking care of poor children and elderly uses tax money, which Cons are opposed to.
2007-05-21 09:59:15 · answer #1 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 2 · 16⤊ 9⤋
Yes, and people who are pro choice should be supporting all the things that pro lifers oppose. I find it funny that it's completely opposite. These two terms have completely taken on the wrong meanings and it has turned a lot of people into a bunch of hypocrits. Either that or they really don't know what they are, they just go by whatever their party is going by. Which in that case makes them sheep.
2007-05-21 17:03:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They only care about the fetus till birth or untill they can stop using it as an excuse to gather funds
2007-05-21 17:08:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
I support all of those.
Equal Rights
PRIVATE health care for all citizens
I don't think anyone likes war, but sometimes its inevitable
I oppose the Death penalty, but I oppose letting violent criminals out on parole even more. Jail for life at a work camp in the Florida Everglades is appropriate for child molesters, rapists, etc.
I don't think anyone agrees with torture and abuse
I don't agree with Racism, which is why I am against Affirmative Action, ***** Scholarships, etc. All these are racist ideas.
Thank you.
--P.S. That means that pro-choice people must disagree with all of those. No WONDER you guys don't get it!
2007-05-21 16:58:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 6⤋
What makes you think they don't? Is it maybe because they feel that they shouldn't have to pay for everybody else's decisions? I don't understand what you mean by Equal Rights for the Living.
2007-05-21 18:23:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Babies is soo cute....then they can join the Marines and we can send them off to fight and die without remorse. See Pro life. Got it! now just keep repeating it until it sounds right.
2007-05-21 17:08:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Not when it's "buffet line" conservatism where you get to pick and choose which 'good' things you want to follow and ignore the rest. For example, the Christian Right goes bonkers and expends all sorts of time and energy on gay marriage yet you don't hear any of them crying about banning divorce (many of them practice divorce). Yet, Jesus was also against divorce. They pick and choose what things to hold sacred and look the other way on others that are too inconvenient (or if might cost them a dollar). That's called being inconsistent and it's where they lose the most credibility.
2007-05-21 16:57:50 · answer #7 · answered by ok4u2bfree 2 · 10⤊ 7⤋
Nope!
=
2007-05-21 17:05:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Then by your logic,do pro choice people get to choose between any of those.
2007-05-21 17:00:22 · answer #9 · answered by DAMN!!!!!!!! 1 · 5⤊ 4⤋
No,there is no one uniform BELIEF SYSTEM that we should all be forced by the state to adopt like the liberals want to do through their institutionalized plan of peer pressure through political correctness.
2007-05-21 17:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by wqfahuar 3 · 2⤊ 6⤋
You are trying to make these unrelated issues the same. They are not.
2007-05-21 17:09:15 · answer #11 · answered by mikehunt29 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋