2007-05-21 09:41:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
To be unmovable, an object would have to have an infinite amount of mass. Such objects don't exist, so the question is rather pointless.
It's easy to hypothesize two mutually contradictory concepts and ask "what if ... ?". For example, what if an unanswerable question were given to somebody who knows the answer to everything? What if an animal that is immune to every poison ate something that is poisonous to every living being? What if somebody who hates all music listened to music that everybody likes? Etc. etc.
Just my opinion.
2007-05-21 10:21:23 · answer #1 · answered by minicooperrich 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you describe won't be able to take place, as a results of fact if the object strikes it has then ceased to be immovable, or if the object stops it relatively is obviously no longer unstoppable. consequently in the two circumstances the unique pretext of the test might have been shown to be incorrect. even consisting of your Helluva bang commentary, that should propose that one or the two between the unique pretexts became incorrect. consequently logically an unstoppable rigidity can in no way meet an unmovable merchandise. The regulations of physics preclude it.
2016-11-04 22:02:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will be an interaction. (Composed of that force and of the object's reaction). That reaction will be equal to the unstopable force, if you object is also undeformable.
(If I guess correct, give me my ten points !)
2007-05-21 09:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of the infinite energy involved in the collision, a volume of infinite energy density will be produced-- a black hole. This will suck the earth in, along with the immovable object, and the unstoppable force. Life as we know it would end.
2007-05-21 10:05:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question and the answer both disappear! Such play of words is no doubt amusing but has little use otherwise.
2007-05-21 09:55:38 · answer #5 · answered by Swamy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dunno.
But, if you're researching at MIT or Berkeley, the NSF will gladly unload millions of taxpayer dollars to fund your pie-in-the-sky research.
2007-05-21 09:44:39 · answer #6 · answered by not gh3y 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will annihilate each other and vanish from the face of universe.
2007-05-21 09:44:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, since they are mutually exclusive, anything you want to imagine can happen.
2007-05-21 09:49:43 · answer #8 · answered by Michael B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can God create a stone which he himself cannot lift???
2007-05-21 10:45:11 · answer #9 · answered by alien 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing, if you are not there to observe it.
2007-05-21 09:51:52 · answer #10 · answered by johnfarruca 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋