I think they just want the NRA to know they won't take away their guns if elected. STUPID!
P.S. If its a bear, is it still considered "defenseless"?
2007-05-21 09:05:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by kermit 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
They don't. Your percetion is a far cry from reality. Whether or not a candidate hunts is completely irrelevent to the job they would do in office. Now if you are a whacko PETA supporter, you may only vote on that issue and of course a hunter could never get your vote (even if they solved world hunger, abortion, and got us out of Iraq). Stating a woman would do differently shows a lack of understanding of the politicians of this nation. They will pander to whatever voting base they are talking to. When in Iowa, do as the Iowans - and when in Oregon, do as the Oregonians. They will either hug the tree or shoot the pheasants living in it.
Those are the facts.
2007-05-21 08:57:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by thinking-guru 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well now, that's a big fat shot at religion there guru. Have you heard any presidential candidate say they go hunting because of their religion? Sure, some people might defend hunting from criticism with religion, but I don't think anybody says to themselves... ya know Jesus said to kill all the animals... let me go bag myself a stag.
Actually I think it has to do with primal alpha male instincts. In other words, people will imagine that candidate x can run the country just because he or she can hunt (I good leader... grunt grunt). Those survival skills somehow make us think that the person is a good leader. But it doesn't make any logical sense. Really what we need is someone who knows how to make good decisions, not someone who can necessarily aim a gun.
2007-05-21 08:39:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
at the start, why ought to Barack practice his start certificates, whilst McBush HASN'T published HIS one thousand website wellness archives FOR greater effective than 3 HOURS. Like we've been meant to examine all that for the time of one hundred eighty minute. additionally, your merely doin' this because of the fact which you're scared that consumer-friendly sense (the Demo cratic occasion) is gonna Rock the White domicile (or ought to I say...Barrack the White domicile). You wanna reason to maintain Barack from victory, no be counted how underhanded it quite is. Plus, he replaced into born in u.s.. final time I checked, Hawaii is area of the 50, so he's immediately an American citizen. to boot, he's been livin in u.s. for 40-something years, so as that (if he wasn't already an American Citizen, WHICH he's) he would be granted citizenship besides.
2016-12-17 19:14:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because all presidential candidates up to this point (in the U.S.) have been men. and yes, i believe a woman would not go hunting and might even disagree with the whole idea of hunting. But for guys, it's a bonding thing. hey, look you guys, i'm as cool as you are. so give me your money and your votes!
my opinion only ;D
2007-05-21 08:37:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by FIGJAM 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because it instantly goes a long way towards assuring that they don't have the NRA lobbying against them. Why they don't just go to a firing range, I have no idea, but that's my take on it.
2007-05-21 10:48:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Religion of course. The US is a nation of godfreaks. Godfreaks love to claim that all animal life is at their disposal. They even will quote you the bible and such.
2007-05-21 08:35:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by guru 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
it will come the day that each and everybody of us will not take for granted what they say.they just try to do things that we want us to.behaviour is dictated by man's philosophy of life...
2007-05-21 08:58:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by clarel c 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
so they can show the gun nuts that the 2nd ammend. is protected. plain and simple.
2007-05-21 08:50:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by donna p. 3
·
2⤊
0⤋