Americans, could they handle REAL freedom?

Question

If the Libertarian party ever gained the majority of both the house & senate seats & Ron Paul was our commander in cheif, would Americans be able to handle the rush of freedoms that would follow? I'm not asking this sarcastically but as a legitimate question. Could Americans really set their own agendas? Would they know how to invest financially for retirement with out sociol security, hold a job on their own or just plain think out side of the box? With the TERIFFIC amount of extra cash/buying power available to them from reduced taxes & a strong stable dollar, not to mention increased sociol freedoms, would they just go bananas? I mean no PC, no IRS, no federal reserve, no lifestyle fears, no politicking, I mean just free to quide your own destiny in the pursuit of happiness. Like children escaping parental authority, would they end up in self rebellion, & once again ensnareing themselves in the web of the "never far away politicians(magicians!)" control. Need your input on this!

Answer 1

Honestly I believe you will find many people not sure what to do with all there extra money once taxes are abolished. youll also have many politicians layed off since beurocracy would be cut. Illegal aliens would be leaving the country since they cannot get anything free anymore.

Answer 2

Some could some couldn't. This actually is how the U.S. was before FDR. It allowed many people to build incredibly successful businesses, but it also trapped many into wage slavery (where you spent all your wages buying food from and paying rent to the company you worked for). Especially today as the U.S. moves away from a manufacturing based economy, to achieve success will require higher education, most likely to the Masters level. Most people who are not from wealthy families can not afford to go to college without Federal help. For the poorer segments of the community the extra money saved on taxes (those that owe taxes that is) would just go keeping their heads above water and trying to make up the services that they lost from the government. Dereuglation of many industrial sectors has not led to more effiency but rather crisis in the power, and airline sectors. Going to back to a gold standard or any precious metal standard won;t make the dollar anymore stable as the current worlwide commodities markets have their value on a roller coaster. While the government should back off and allow more social freedoms and require more personal responsibility, the Libertarian ideal simply will not work in today's world. On a personal note, I do think that Ron Paul is the most honest and straight forward candidate that the Republicans have had in the last twenty plus years, so he has my respect.

Answer 3

With all due respect to Dr. Paul and the Libertarian Party, I doubt it.

Here's my thinking (for what it's worth):

Suppose the Libertarians gain that majority, with Dr. Paul as President. His first act -- most likely -- would be to call back American troops from almost all over the world and cut 'way, 'way back on defence spending.

Uh-oh. Defence contractors have to lay off thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, of workers. Spinoff industries shrink in response.

This means economic freefall in California (among other places). California is the most heavily populated -- and therefore most vote-rich -- state.

I think this would mean a one-term (or shorter) Presidency for Dr. Paul. Which means that the real freedom you describe would almost certainly not have time to be implemented.

Answer 4

Many people would go nuts. And, perhaps an entire generation would go nuts. But, sensibility would prevail, and people really would do what they needed to do in order to secure their futures. We are not mindless idiots that need the government to hold our hands or tell us what is best for us.

If the government really wanted to help, they'd cut these stupid gas companies off at the knees and we'd stop paying higher and higher prices while the rich get richer and richer from the profits....

Answer 5

We'd also be free of environmental controls and corporate oversight, right?

We'd be "free" to work 18 hour days, 7 days a week for slave wages, and live over toxic waste (remember "Love Canal"?), and all that extra money would be supporting our aging parents who got gypped out of the SSI they've been paying into their whole lives, and paying for doctors to take care of us because we've all gotten cancer since the corporations don't have to be accountable to anyone anymore.

Sound's like a plan to me.

Answer 6

of direction 'freedom' is a relative term. except you have been raised interior the wooded area by ability of wolves, you commonly have constraints on your habit that contain belonging to a society. each and every person consistently has the liberty to help the government and to obey its regulations. in case you do, then you relatively might no longer understand the version between residing in a 'unfastened' u . s . and one that may not seen by ability of outsiders to be 'unfastened.' yet critics of their government comprehend regardless of if or no longer they stay in a 'unfastened' u . s .. many countries, have, sometimes, dealt with critics of their government - particularly harshly. case in point, Nazi Occupied France interior the Forties became no longer unfastened. France, in turn, did no longer enable its colonials freedom and consequently they rebelled. I communicate from journey in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, South Africa, Vietnam and Russia.

Answer 7

At this point I kinda believe most Americans hate freedom since they scream for government to take it away from them. Keeping this in mind, No I don't think people could handle freedom

Answer 8

I do not think your beliefs are well-founded or realistic. I also do not think people understand the responsibilities that come along with rights well enough to exercise them thoughtfully. It is not necessarily a bad thing to limit freedom.

Answer 9

I'm not sure. Nor do I believe, however, that all of your changes would come to pass from a Paul administration.

But I'm still going to vote for the guy.

Answer 10

I think some could and others would run amok. the US government are the ones that couldn't handle true freedom.