English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or did the US somehow sneak over to Lebanon to draw some AL Qaeda terrrorists out of Iraq. I ask this since libs think terrorists are CREATED by the military if they fight against them. Their solution is not to fight terrorists because it only creates more. Do you agree? If so what caused the terrorists to go to Lebanon?
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05212007/news/worldnews/al_qaeda_linked_battle_erupts_in_lebanon_worldnews_.htm

2007-05-21 08:24:52 · 11 answers · asked by JudiBug 5 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Listen, I'm from Lebanon, and the thing is that Syria doesn't want The International Tribunal to happen, so, the terrorists that were in Iraq are transfered through Syria to Lebanon. You see there are only two ways to get to Lebanon, either by sea, or through Israel or Syria. Now the situation here is exactly the same as it was in 1975, but the only difference is that the army back then was divided into Muslims and Christians, and now the army is united, so there would actually be hope. Now, we, the Lebanese, all we have to do is to bear the bombs and terrorisme and try to save our selves until The International Tribunal will happen. For if now, at this hour, Lebanon said that we don't want The International Tribunal, all this will stop in one second. And Bachar Al Assad said that he will set Lebanon on fire if The International Tribunal would happen, so Syria is the source of all this terrorism, adding many other countries that are seeking for their own interest through our country.

2007-05-22 05:44:20 · answer #1 · answered by chrbl956 2 · 1 0

These are some of the better answers I have seen from the socialists

let's see
Al Qaeda is funded and armed by CIA from a Brit who quotes a socialist rag as his source, man that is rich.

There are no Al-Qaeda in Lebanon., did not bother to read the article just spewed the commie line.

These are good kiddo, I get a real chuckle out of 'em

2007-05-21 09:42:26 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1 0

That would be a silly argument. that would mean we were fighting nobody until we started fighting. Obviously there were terrorists and many headed to Iraq once the fighting with Sadaam was over. Although I think radicals may use the war as a recruiting tool there were plenty out there before we started fighting them.

2007-05-21 08:29:22 · answer #3 · answered by Brian 7 · 3 1

the perfect occasion human beings distant places coverage helping your thesis is the reality that we armed the two factors interior the Iran-Iraq conflict in the process the 1880s! yet i do no longer think of that has been the determining ingredient in our distant places coverage. in the process the chilly conflict, Containment became of course our guiding principle. each and every action we took became to contain the unfold of communism. that commonly meant helping capitalist dictatorships over socialist or communist democratic strikes (ex. Chile, Nicaragua). as a results of fact the tip of the chilly conflict, our distant places coverage has been to sell stability, capitalism and unfastened commerce. As for Israel, US distant places coverage has consistently been very professional-Israel, regardless of the shown fact that it has hardly ever been anti-Palestinian. We provide billions in help to Muslim worldwide places jointly as concurrently making certain Israel's risk-free practices. If our purpose became to maintain others susceptible, we'd merely thoroughly withdraw from the middle East and watch the resultant conflict smash the completed area.

2016-11-04 21:49:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are no Al-Qaeda in Lebanon.
Don't give us more terrorist that we already have.
That Al-Qadea thing is PURE speculation and have not heard anything to actually back up this claim.
In case you hadn't noticed, people with similar motives sometimes team up...if there are terrorists in Tripoli with ties to Al-Qaeda, they are probably financial ties, since Israel has ham-strung the Palestinian gov't and cut off all their funding, even to legitimate teachers and police.
And yes, by fighting someone, you usually piss them off, which makes them retaliate.

2007-05-21 08:44:52 · answer #5 · answered by Waiting and Wishing 6 · 3 1

i personally think it is their lifestyles of the country. the way the public education system is there, etc. you have to remember that saudia arabia was teaching its children in its public schools that christians, people from western countries, were evil. this is something that will take a few lifetimes to get rid of if we ever do. mostly its the lifestyle over there in the middle east.

2007-05-21 09:23:17 · answer #6 · answered by Ida 5 · 0 0

yes the Israeli invasion created the problems there. Lebanon was making progress.
edit. terrorists are not created by military force,but it can draw them to where the military invasion occurs

2007-05-21 08:30:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

saying the US created terrorists is like saying little boys and girls create pedophiles.

only LIBS would accept such a theory.

2007-05-21 08:29:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Nice question. Does not seem to be drawing many idiots in here to attack Bush. I will star it for you.

2007-05-21 08:32:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Al Qaeda is funded and armed by CIA.

Raygun and King Bush 1 (who was head of CIA during Raugun's time) funded, armed and trained Saddam and Bin Laden.

2007-05-21 08:28:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

fedest.com, questions and answers