2007-05-21 08:15:21 · 11 answers · asked by rams_2k7 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Taxes ➔ Other - Taxes
I think it's not how long you worked , but the amount of money you made. You could call them.
2007-05-21 08:33:41 · answer #1 · answered by eviechatter 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you asked this in the previous so it could seem your different submit replaced into deleted or you probably did no longer like the responses if she won't inform you techniques she filed, you probable could be clever to document married one after the different for each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, and be performed with it in case you do not have her SSN to flow into on the 1040, you do not have it, you may no longer do something approximately that for many of those years the exemption is not any distinctive on your very own exemption and the traditional deduction for many of those years is probable comparable to submitting single the end result would be a similar the two way and a minimum of you get your taxes filed and modern-day you do comprehend that any refund for 2006, 2007, and 2008 are long long previous
2016-11-25 22:25:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. Did you have any other type of income? Unemployment is taxable by the IRS if you received it in 2006. Dividends, interest, any number of other things. If your question was "If you don't have any income of any kind in 2006 do you need to file a tax return?" the answer would be "no".
2007-05-21 10:59:25 · answer #3 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As long as you have no reportable income you do not have to submit one. If you recieved income from bank accounts or investments you will need to file a tax return.
It doesn't have to do with whether you worked or not it is based upon if you made money.
2007-05-21 08:20:41 · answer #4 · answered by p_s_u_paul 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you make below a certain amount you do not have to file a tax return. But you need to find out exactly what that amount is.
2007-05-21 08:24:34 · answer #5 · answered by metalprincess6399 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not how much you worked, it's how much income you have. But if your total income was below the limit for your filing status, then no, you don't need to file.
If you had self-employment income over $400 you'd have to file.
If your income was not self-employment, then if you're single you could make up to $5150 if you're a dependent, $8450 if you're not, and you wouldn't have to file.
Other filing statuses have different limits.
2007-05-21 08:31:12 · answer #6 · answered by Judy 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definately file it's to your be interest as for your social sercurity .If you don't make up to a certain amount you don't have to file but i'd file any way you may have something coming back , or be able to claim eic.
2007-05-21 08:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by joannaduplessis@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The answer is yes...the reason is because you may have gained interest or had other incomes. But more importantly it keeps the IRS off your butt.
2007-05-21 08:20:11 · answer #8 · answered by J G 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-05-21 08:18:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i don't think you would need to but maybe you should....
2007-05-21 08:22:40 · answer #10 · answered by Kayyla. 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋