English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think there´s something in between ?

Thanks for answer me.

2007-05-21 06:53:14 · 9 answers · asked by ¸.•*¨*`•.¸тαтι¸.•*¨*`•.¸ 4 in Health Women's Health

9 answers

I think abortion should be a choice in very severe disabilities or genetic disorders which are not viable out of utero. In my country this is not so and even anencephalic babies are delivered.
I would also consider it in situations of rape and abuse...although i wouldn't shove it as a first option but let the woman decide on her own.

However, even though i can understand their fear, their pain and the suffering that they endure after, i cannot agree with woman who think that it is a "choice" to kill a perfectly healthy child simply because they do not want it at this point in life, when thousands and thousands of couples are trying to conceive unsuccessfully. Adoption must be a painful process, having to give up your child after having felt him/her so close to you for 9 months, but at least you will know that he/she will have a chance at having a good life they deserve.
I don't think it can be more painful than knowing that you ended your child's life.

Also i think that late abortions should be banned outright everywhere. The neurological system of the child would be intact and you'd practically be pulling it apart piece by piece. Sorry for being so graphic.

2007-05-21 07:09:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I am pro-choice because we do not have the right to judge what other people do since it does not affect us. I personally would not abort if I became pregnant, but it is different for everyone. People think only in black and white, but we do not know the situation. Life is full of uncertainty and I believe we need abortion as a choice.

I understand why people are pro-life and everything. That people should take responsibility for their actions, it is wrong to kill, there are other options, and we are making a decision when the child inside doesn't even have a chance to have a say.

As long as women do it early in the pregnancy then I believe it is OK, I would not think of her as a killer. When I see teenagers pregnant I have a lot of respect for them because they decided to keep the baby, but if I found out a girl or a grown woman had a abortion I would not think any less of her.

I do think there is a middle ground, we just haven't thought of it yet.

2007-05-21 07:17:59 · answer #2 · answered by colorfulsunrise514 2 · 1 0

I'm kinda both so yeah I guess there is an in between. There are circumstances where I think pro choice comes in like rape cases etc... but the child can also be put up for adoption if the woman can't or doesn't want to raise it. So all in all I guess I'm in the middle.

2007-05-21 06:57:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ashley_71 2 · 1 0

Pro-Choice comes in many forms. You can be against abortion but if you beleive that it should be up to the woman to decide.. you are still pro choice. It pretty much comes down to being in favor of women having their own rights to their bodies.

2007-05-21 08:38:24 · answer #4 · answered by Alls 2 · 1 0

Pro Choice
A woman has the right to personal choose if she will bring a child into this world. The woman has the right to consider her personal situation when making this decission. I do not see an (in-between).

2007-05-21 07:01:21 · answer #5 · answered by whymewhynow 5 · 1 0

I'm pro-choice, because I don't believe that it's up to the government to tell me what I can or can't do if I choose not to be pregant.

I guess there can be an in-between, but only because of what you, yourself, would do if you got pregnant.

2007-05-21 07:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by porcelina_68 5 · 1 0

pro-choice......I beleive that women should be able to decide if they are able to keep a child or if they aren't able to take care of the baby...there are a lot things you need to consider when having a child and when deciding to not have one...

2007-05-21 06:57:29 · answer #7 · answered by Gordita de Oro 4 · 1 0

i'm able to't say that I relatively have a sparkling, sparkling definition even though it would not contain existence form abortions even though it does enable abortions for rape, incest, intense delivery defects and the actual well-being of the mum. that's relatively a tricky subject count number as a results of fact the mum has rights yet i do no longer see the place they trump the baby's top to existence. A top to privateness (which isn't in the form yet has been inferred via the suitable courtroom) shouldn't trump a top to existence (that's in the form and being first trumps all others). considering the fact that existence isn't a card interest there are aspects that can swing the concern of each and every top yet of course abortion happens lots via and vast than i could anticipate for those products the place that's in all possibility to have some valid application. I war with the region for the line. absolutely everyone who believes that they comprehend the place it must be has the two no longer seen the subject count number, has a faith based reaction that overrides the venture, or has no theory what they're asserting. this could be a very complicated venture.

2016-11-25 22:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by aoay 4 · 0 0

Pro-choice
I am a guy and I don't think I should have the right to force a woman to have a baby if she doesn't want to.

2007-05-21 07:04:59 · answer #9 · answered by alibaba 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers