can hillary clinton bring america and the world together?

Question

hillary will bring a fresh wind and a person who listens and willing to help each and every country in the world

Answer 1

in your dreams----Grrrrrr

Answer 2

NO HILLARY CAN'T because she doesn't have the charisma, but BARACK OBAMA COULD,if, IF he were given a chance, but NEVER FEAR .....
dirty politic playing republicans will NOT let a BLACK MAN WIN the presidency! RACISM IS STILL RUNNING RAMPANT IN AMERICA. Hillary have a better chance of winning because she is white, BUT a poor chance of winning BECAUSE she is a she! IT IS TOOOOOOOOOO DAMN BAD her husband isn't or can't run. Even the FEW REPUBLICANS, who are sane of mind, would rather have BILL than BUSH and voting for GHOULEEEE ANEEE IS the same as putting BUSH BACK IN. So, when you add everything up, HILLARY is actually the more viable candidate; she is not a BUSHITE,although she teeters,she
is NOT BLACK,although she knows how to paint on a minstrel face and speak Ebonics, and BEST OF ALL, she has a husband who was the BEST PRESIDENT SINCE JFK to help her make good decisions.

About 5 years ago CNN did an interview with people on the streets in many countries to see how they felt about BILL CLINTON, RONALD REGAN, AND BUSH...the younger ones said they loved CLINTON, the older ones said CLINTON was the best President AMERICA ever had so the consensus was CLINTON was best for AMERICA and best FOR the world. We have some idiots still worried about what BILL CLINTON DOES WITH HIS PENIS, CALLING HIM A WHORE.ugh!
I couldn't care less about his sexual activities, ALL I KNOW IS WHEN HE WAS SUPPOSEDLY SEXING MONICA THIS COUNTRY WAS IN THE BEST SHAPE IT HAD EVER BEEN with SEVERAL TRILLION dollars in the treasury in comparision with being BANKRUPT like now.

AMERICA OWE BIG BUCKS TO OTHER COUNTRIES, not SO when BILL was in. IT IS TOO BAD BUSH didn't do some whoring, maybe he would have ran the country better and maybe he would have been too happy to fabricate wmd AND get us into a war NOOOOOOOBODY wants or believes in.

IF AMERICANS were smart they would close their eyes to what ethnic group or what gender or political party one is in and just VOTE for THE BEST PERSON.

Answer 3

The question should not be can Hilary bring America and the World together, but who can bring America and the world together? The more I learn about each politician the more I dislike politicians. Each politician will criticize, condemn, contrast and complain about the other side of the aisle (Dividing), instead of talking about that we can all agree about or the good things someone has done (Unite). The American people want SOLUTIONS, regardless of political party. ALWAYS REMEMBER: "UNITE WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL"!!!

Answer 4

How foolish are you? Hillary and those like her are the very reason most traditional societies hate America. Hillary would seek to impose a secular agenda of gay rights(marriage) women's rights(gender equity) separation of church and state(outlawing of public displays of religious symbols) and other things that most of the world finds offensive, not just on the American people but on the rest of the word as well. This is not a recipe for world unity but instead a recipe for disaster. Just who do people like her think they are that they can disrespect the will of those who do not hold their death culture in high esteem?

Answer 5

Sure she can, just ask Bill, she and Bill are the perfect couple and are so in vogue with Democratic ideologues. I just bet ole Bill can hardly wait to be back in the oval house with those young interns. The French will love us again and the muslin nut jobs will be singing praises to Ala.

Answer 6

Hiliary is one of the most divisive figures in American politics today... how is it that she will bring the country together?... al Queda did a better job of uniting this country and even that only lasted as long as the DNC allowed it too before they started blaming everything they could on Bush in their attempt to gain back control...

Answer 7

Let's face it, the vast majority of countries on this planet regard women as inferiors. How exactly can we expect them to respect a woman head-of-state, let alone expect them to compromise and negotiate in good faith?

PS: Why do you think Condoleeza Rice is so ineffective as Secretary of State?

Answer 8

Absolutely not. She would actually make things worse. A lot of people would refuse to follow her and it would tear this country apart. Her ways would also turn other countries against us. Im not being sexist, but a female president would not recieve the domestic or foreign respect right now. I guess it doesnt matter though, its not like she wil actually win.

Answer 9

Hillary Clinton? What? You Lib's are so wishy-washy. First you claim that is is not our place to interfere with other countries, now you claim that Clinton will help all countries (which is impossible). Make up your minds.

Answer 10

Hell no!
The Hillary Project
Educate yourself on the most corrupt politician in recent history
Hillary Clinton is an unethical and selfish woman. Now she wants to be president. Her craving for power and wounds from failures on a monumental scale are driving her to put our country at risk again. Our mission is to educate the people of our country to what they're up against and just how dangerous the notion of her becoming president really is.
There are 527 days and 0 hours until election day 2008.
Category: News
Posted 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Hillary Clinton: pro-Israel groups put off by remarks

by Kathy

Senator Hillary Clinton is attempting to shore up votes of pro-Israel groups for the 2008 elections by attending a dinner of pro-Israel groups in Manhattan this past week. During that dinner she spoke to approximately 1700 people whom according to every news report I read gave her rave reviews. Today I have read another not so biased report on how Senator Hillary Clinton’s remarks were really received that evening.

I think we should backtrack a moment to establish a few facts concerning Israel’s current postion in the middle east. First, Israel is in conflict internally with Palestinians and the terrorist group Hamas in the Gaza Strip and West Bank and externally with the terrorist group Hezbollah. Hezbollah is currently sitting on the other side of its border in Lebanon. This past year Hezbollah kidnapped Israeli soldiers that ignited a war which included rockets being fired into Israel purposely targeting civilian locations.

There are other middle east conflicts that could potentially involve Israel in Iraq and Iran. The Iraq Study Group as you recall had offered up the Golan Heights at Israel’s expense to Syria as appeasement to Iran and Syria. Both Iran and Syria are interfering with the security and stability of Iraq by providing arms and financing the Shite militia’s in Iraq. Israel has stated:
“The government views the Golan Heights as essential to the security of the state and its water resources. Retaining Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights will be the basis for an arrangement with Syria.”

If that isn’t enough; There is still the issue of Iran and its nuclear enrichment program barreling full speed ahead even against the protests of its neighbors and the United Nation. The United Nations has already adopted resolution 1737 on Iran in December 2006. If Iran continues to ignore all attempts to stop its nuclear program, Israel may very well take the lead in resolving that issue.

All of these issues served as a backdrop for Senator Hillary Clinton as she spoke at a pro-Israel dinner in Times Square this past week. As I posted previously; Hillary’s remarks were not aligned with her current posture on the war nor the anti-war position of her party. I have now found that the majority of main-stream newspapers did not provide the complete story her speech and the audience’s reaction.

In those newspapers covering the event we read that she received applause from the audience concerning her scathing remarks on Iran’s decision to hold a conference last month that questioned whether the Holocaust took place. Some of her other statements were printed without a single word about the audience’s reaction. What was left out was how these Pro-Israel groups reacted to those and other statements made by the Senator that evening. Here is an excerpt from the New York Post that provides a little more insight into Hillary’s views and how it was received that evening:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton drew grumbles at a pro-Israel dinner in Times Square last night when she encouraged “engaging” with Iran before taking stronger action to keep it nuke-free. Clinton said she wasn’t sure “anything positive would come out of it” and she didn’t know if it was “the smartest strategy to take,” but added, “There are a number of factors that I think argue for some attempt to do what I have suggested.”

She called for a better understanding of how Iran “really functions,” warning actions beyond sanctions could increase danger in the region.

“I also want to send a message, if we ever do have to take more drastic action, to the rest of the world that we exhausted all possibilities,” said Clinton.

Clinton’s remarks at the Marriott Marquis were met with little applause, and after she left the stage, several people said they were put off by the presidential candidate. “This is the wrong crowd to do that with,” said one person at the dinner, noting the pro-Israel crowd wanted to hear tougher rhetoric.

Senator Clintons remarks certainly highlight her lack of understanding of the issues in Iran. She is talking about “better understanding” and “not sure if anything positive would come of it” when United Nations resolutions have already been adopted and the need to implement some sort of economic sanctions is quickly approaching. Now is the time for action with Iran not “better understanding”. Hillary is still on meaningless talking points. Her remarks last week show she is not prepared for the tough foreign policy decisions that are required as President.

Answer 11

no, but you are right, she brings a lot of wind. her focus should not be helping every other country in the world, though.